Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality assurance indicators in anatomic pathology.

H Travers1

  • 1Department of Pathology, McKennan Hospital, Sioux Falls, SD.

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
|November 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary

Quality assurance indicators in anatomic pathology are crucial for evaluating technical and cognitive processes in report generation. These indicators ensure patient care quality and support continuous improvement in pathology services.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of ultrasound.

Journal of genetic counseling·2013
Same author

A technique to maintain pneumoperitoneum and allow easy inspection of the abdomen after specimen delivery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2012
Same author

Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to at least one tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: results of a forty-eight–week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial.

Arthritis and rheumatism·2012
Same author

Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a forty-eight-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial.

Arthritis and rheumatism·2011
Same author

Protocols for high efficiency, stage-specific retroviral transduction of murine fetal thymocytes and thymic epithelial cells.

Journal of immunological methods·2001
Same author

Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Ad Hoc Committee on Stored Tissue, College of American Pathologists.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1999

Area of Science:

  • Anatomic Pathology
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Quality assurance (QA) indicators in anatomic pathology are essential for assessing the technical and cognitive aspects of generating pathology reports.
  • The pathology report is a critical intermediate outcome influencing patient care and a valuable resource for QA studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the general requirements for a comprehensive QA program in anatomic pathology.
  • To identify specific QA indicators for surgical pathology, cytopathology, and autopsy pathology.
  • To highlight unique QA considerations in cytopathology due to its dual screening and diagnostic functions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of general requirements for QA programs, including data management, analysis, action, and evaluation, aligning with Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations standards.
  • Identification of specific indicators for surgical pathology and cytopathology, focusing on report timeliness, diagnostic accuracy, clinical relevance, and proficiency testing.
  • Development of unique indicators for cytopathology, addressing false-negative detection and inter-observer variability (cytotechnologist vs. cytopathologist diagnoses).
  • Inclusion of QA indicators for autopsy pathology, encompassing both subdiscipline-specific metrics and integration into broader clinical QA programs.

Main Results:

  • Established general QA program requirements encompassing data handling, documentation, and personnel standards.
  • Defined specific QA indicators for surgical pathology and cytopathology, emphasizing report quality and diagnostic precision.
  • Introduced unique cytopathology indicators for enhanced accuracy and reliability.
  • Integrated autopsy pathology QA into clinical quality assurance frameworks.

Conclusions:

  • Effective QA indicators are vital for ensuring the accuracy and clinical relevance of anatomic pathology reports.
  • A robust QA program, incorporating specific indicators for different subdisciplines, is fundamental to optimizing patient care outcomes.
  • Continuous monitoring and evaluation of QA indicators drive improvements in pathology services and patient safety.

Related Experiment Videos