Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Characterizing Recent Trends of Postpartum Hemorrhage and Management in the United States: OB-PPH Network.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026

Same author

Effect of iron dose in maternal multiple micronutrient supplement on perceived side effects, adherence, acceptability and preferences: protocol for a randomised crossover trial.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Correction: Factors affecting antenatal corticosteroid use in low- and middle-income countries: Facility characteristics, structural readiness, and past performance of CEmONC signal functions.

PLOS global public health·2026

Same author

Childhood cancer care in Northern Tanzania: hospital infrastructure and provision of services.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026

Same author

Quality of first antenatal care visits and perinatal outcomes: Evidence from a cohort study in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and India.

PLOS global public health·2026

Same author

The impact of an oral purified microbiome therapeutic on the gastrointestinal microbiome.

Nature medicine·2026

Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026

Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026

Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Tracking spatial information during reading: a cue-based process.

Emily R Smith¹, Edward J O'Brien

¹Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA. ersmith@unh.edu

Memory & Cognition

|March 15, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Readers update spatial information only when cues or specific task demands, like adopting a protagonist's perspective, make it accessible. This suggests a cue-based mechanism governs spatial memory during reading.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psycholinguistics
Human Memory

Background:

Understanding how readers track spatial information is crucial for cognitive science.
Previous research suggests spatial updating relies on various cognitive mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if a cue-based mechanism explains the tracking of spatial information during reading.
To determine the conditions under which spatial information is updated or maintained.

Main Methods:

Five experiments measured reading times for sentences contradicting previously stated locations.
Manipulated the presence of cues to earlier spatial information and reader task demands (e.g., perspective-taking).

Main Results:

Reading times were disrupted when target sentences contained cues to earlier spatial information.
Disruption occurred only when readers adopted the protagonist's perspective if all spatial cues were absent.
Spatial information is encoded but not automatically updated without specific cues or task demands.

Conclusions:

Results support a cue-based mechanism for spatial updating in reading.
Spatial information accessibility is key; readers update representations when cues or perspective-taking increases accessibility.
This mechanism highlights the active and context-dependent nature of spatial cognition during text comprehension.