Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery have a beneficial effect on mortality in patients with left ventricular
Omar A Jarral1, Srdjan Saso, Thanos Athanasiou
1Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK. omarjarral@gmail.com
Insights
Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) shows limited evidence for improved short-term mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. More high-quality trials are needed to confirm benefits compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (ONCAB).
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Surgical Mortality
Background:
- Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) presents unique challenges in coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) aims to reduce complications associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.
- The comparative efficacy of OPCAB versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (ONCAB) in LVD patients remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the beneficial effect of OPCAB on mortality compared to ONCAB in patients with LVD.
- To synthesize the best available evidence regarding surgical technique and patient outcomes in this specific population.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 17 studies (1 prospective randomized trial, 1 meta-analysis, 15 retrospective studies) focusing on patients with LVD.
- Analysis of short-term (<30-day), mid-term (30 days to 5 years), and long-term (>5 years) mortality.
- Assessment of study limitations, including data age, baseline characteristics, revascularization completeness, and reporting standards.
Main Results:
- The prospective trial indicated significantly lower in-hospital mortality with OPCAB.
- The meta-analysis of seven studies showed no significant difference in operative mortality.
- Retrospective studies yielded mixed results for short-term mortality, with no significant differences in mid- or long-term mortality. Eight of nine studies reported poorer revascularization with OPCAB.
Conclusions:
- Limited evidence suggests OPCAB may offer improved short-term mortality, but significant study limitations exist.
- The majority of included studies predate modern surgical techniques and lack detailed reporting.
- High-quality prospective randomized trials, such as the CORONARY trial, are essential to definitively assess OPCAB's role in LVD patients.
Abstract:
A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) offered any beneficial effect on mortality when compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (ONCAB) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). A total of 491 papers were found using the reported searches of which 17 represented the best evidence. The authors, date, journal, study type, outcome measures and results are tabulated. The 17 studies (only containing patients with LVD) comprised of one prospective randomized trial, one meta-analysis and 15 retrospective studies. The prospective trial associated the OPCAB technique with significantly lower in-hospital mortality. By comprising of seven studies and 1512 patients, the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in terms of operative mortality. Of the retrospective studies, all 15 compared short-term mortality (<30-day) of which four showed significantly lower mortality in the OPCAB group. Nine of the studies compared mid-term mortality (30 days to 5 years) with no significant difference detected and three of the studies compared long-term mortality (>5 years) with no significant difference detected. We conclude that there is limited evidence to associate the OPCAB technique with improved short-term mortality. The majority of the studies suffered from significant limitations such as containing data from operations carried out prior to the year 2000, a period when off-pump surgery was in its infancy. They frequently contained major differences in baseline characteristics with no specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, description of handling of patients converted from off-pump to bypass or reporting of myocardial viability and concomitant mitral regurgitation. Nine studies reported completeness of revascularization of which eight associated the OPCAB group with a poorer degree of revascularization making comparisons less valid. The lack of high-quality data indicates that prospective randomized trials are needed. The CRISP Trial ('Coronary artery grafting in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump or on-pump surgery') has recently been halted due to recruitment difficulties. The CORONARY ('Coronary artery bypass surgery off- or on-pump revascularization study') trial is a large international multicentre randomized study that is recruiting well and is likely to provide valuable information in the near future.
Related Concept Videos
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send...
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

