Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq03:21

RNA-seq

RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases. 
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
Ribosome Profiling02:24

Ribosome Profiling

Ribosome profiling or ribo-sequencing is a deep sequencing technique that produces a snapshot of active translation in a cell. It selectively sequences the mRNAs protected by ribosomes to get an insight into a cell’s translation landscape at any given point in time.
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique helps...
Leaky Scanning02:28

Leaky Scanning

During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA.  Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...
Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Bacterial Transcription01:53

Bacterial Transcription

RNA polymerase (RNAP) carries out DNA-dependent RNA synthesis in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Bacteria do not have a membrane-bound nucleus. So, transcription and translation occur simultaneously, on the same DNA template.
Transcription can be divided into three main stages, each involving distinct DNA sequences to guide the polymerase. These are:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

H3K27me3 spreading organizes canonical PRC1 chromatin architecture to regulate developmental programs.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Lessons learned from the exome sequencing of nine cases of infertility and the way forward.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2026
Same author

Androgen activity in the male embryonic hindbrain drives lethal PFA ependymoma.

Nature·2026
Same author

Cellular reprogramming of H3K27M pediatric high-grade glioma to neuron-like state.

Acta neuropathologica communications·2025
Same author

H3K36 Methylation as a Guardian of Epigenome Integrity.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Addendum: Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 regulates B cell fate after positive selection in the germinal center in mice.

The Journal of experimental medicine·2025
Same journal

Erratum for the Research Article "Detecting supramolecular organic nanoparticles during heat wave".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Local signals, systemic decline.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

The mechanics of liver regeneration.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Computing in a memory with physics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Retraction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Making time.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Identification of Key Factors Regulating Self-renewal and Differentiation in EML Hematopoietic Precursor Cells by RNA-sequencing Analysis
12:44

Identification of Key Factors Regulating Self-renewal and Differentiation in EML Hematopoietic Precursor Cells by RNA-sequencing Analysis

Published on: November 11, 2014

Comment on "Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome".

Claudia L Kleinman1, Jacek Majewski

  • 1Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. claudia.kleinman@mcgill.ca

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|March 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

High-throughput sequencing errors, not RNA editing, explain most DNA-RNA differences in human cells. This study revisits RNA editing claims by accounting for systematic sequencing technology errors.

More Related Videos

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library
07:28

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library

Published on: January 10, 2025

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Identification of Key Factors Regulating Self-renewal and Differentiation in EML Hematopoietic Precursor Cells by RNA-sequencing Analysis
12:44

Identification of Key Factors Regulating Self-renewal and Differentiation in EML Hematopoietic Precursor Cells by RNA-sequencing Analysis

Published on: November 11, 2014

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library
07:28

Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library

Published on: January 10, 2025

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
12:54

Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation

Published on: March 7, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Previous research by Li et al. reported significant DNA-RNA differences in human cells, suggesting novel RNA editing mechanisms.
  • These reported differences implied unprecedented levels of RNA editing beyond known pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the findings of Li et al. regarding DNA-RNA differences.
  • To investigate the role of systematic errors in high-throughput sequencing technology in explaining these discrepancies.

Main Methods:

  • Re-analysis of existing high-throughput sequencing data.
  • Identification and quantification of common systematic errors in sequencing technology.
  • Comparison of sequencing error profiles with reported DNA-RNA differences.

Main Results:

  • Most of the claimed DNA-RNA differences are attributable to unaddressed systematic errors in sequencing technology.
  • The study identified specific error patterns consistent with known sequencing artifacts.
  • The extent of novel RNA editing was significantly overestimated in the original study.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic errors in high-throughput sequencing technology are a major confounding factor in DNA-RNA difference analysis.
  • The reported high levels of novel RNA editing by Li et al. are largely explained by these technical artifacts.
  • Further studies must rigorously account for sequencing errors to accurately assess RNA editing.