Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of phenotype algorithms for the detection of adverse events in electronic health record data: a multicentre study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

A distributed analysis approach for pharmacovigilance data from electronic medical records in German university hospitals: the POLAR_MI ETL Pipeline.

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

The Potentially Forgotten Mayor of Chinatown.

The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry·2026
Same author

Secondary Data for Clinical Pharmacists' Decision Support: Evaluating 'Triple Whammy' Interactions Within INTERPOLAR.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Detecting Contraindications in Routinely Collected Healthcare Data to Emulate Decision Support for Medication Reviews Within the INTERPOLAR Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Self-collection for HPV testing among emergency department patients: A prospective, interventional, single-arm, feasibility study.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Classifying prostate cancer malignancy by quantitative histomorphometry.

Markus Loeffler1, Lars Greulich, Patrick Scheibe

  • 1Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. loeffler@imise.uni-leipzig.de

The Journal of Urology
|March 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated histomorphometry using quantitative image analysis can standardize prostate cancer Gleason grading. This method shows promise for reproducible classification, reducing pathologist disagreement in grading.

More Related Videos

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
07:34

Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization

Published on: November 17, 2023

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging
08:40

Quantitation of Protein Expression and Co-localization Using Multiplexed Immuno-histochemical Staining and Multispectral Imaging

Published on: April 8, 2016

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence
07:54

Heterogeneity Mapping of Protein Expression in Tumors using Quantitative Immunofluorescence

Published on: October 25, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Digital pathology
  • Computational analysis
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Prostate cancer grading relies on the Gleason score, which is subjective.
  • Interobserver and intraobserver variability challenge the standardization of Gleason grading.
  • Objective, reproducible methods are needed for accurate prostate cancer assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate automated quantitative histomorphometry for standardized prostate cancer Gleason grading.
  • To develop a reproducible classification outcome using digital image analysis.
  • To assess the potential of objective geometric measures in differentiating Gleason grades.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a method for evaluating digitized H&E stained prostate cancer histology.
  • Utilized color deconvolution and image binarization.
  • Employed a classifier with inverse solidity and inverse compactness on 125 patient samples.

Main Results:

  • Inverse compactness and inverse solidity effectively discriminated Gleason grade 3 from grades 4/5.
  • The developed classifier demonstrated robustness upon sensitivity analysis.
  • Quantitative image analysis provided interpretable measures for Gleason grade differentiation.

Conclusions:

  • Image-based quantitative analysis enables algorithmic differentiation of prostate Gleason grades.
  • Objective measures like inverse solidity and compactness can improve grading reproducibility.
  • Further validation in larger independent patient series is recommended.