Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Does grasping in patient D.F. depend on vision?

A David Milner1, Tzvi Ganel, Melvyn A Goodale

  • 1Department of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|March 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Linking past and present worlds in the visual control of behavior.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

A new framework for facial age estimation in humans and AIs.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Online corrections to visual targets are not a distinct class of movement.

iScience·2026
Same author

Reduced Dissociation Between Perception and Action in Autistic Individuals.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2026
Same author

Preserved perception-action dissociation but altered visuomotor behaviours in healthy aging.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Contribution of auditory distance cues to size constancy in perception and grasping in restricted viewing.

iScience·2025
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Patient D.F.'s grasping abilities, previously thought to challenge vision-for-action, are actually explained by the perception-action model. Her grip scaling relies on haptic feedback, aligning with existing theories.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The widely accepted perception-action model proposes distinct visual processing streams for perception and action.
  • Patient D.F. exhibits profound visual agnosia but retains some visually guided grasping abilities.
  • Recent findings suggested D.F.'s grasping relies solely on somatosensory (haptic) feedback, challenging the perception-action model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the interpretation of patient D.F.'s grasping capabilities in light of new evidence.
  • To determine if D.F.'s preserved grip scaling is exclusively dependent on haptic feedback.
  • To assess the consistency of D.F.'s visual-action performance with the perception-action model.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a recent study examining patient D.F.'s object grasping.

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans
10:51

Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans

Published on: January 15, 2018

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

  • Comparison of observed grasping behaviors with predictions from the perception-action model.
  • Evaluation of the role of visual versus haptic feedback in D.F.'s grip scaling.

    • Main Results:

    • The study's findings indicate that patient D.F.'s grip scaling is not solely dependent on haptic feedback.
    • D.F.'s preserved grasping abilities remain consistent with the established perception-action framework.
    • The dissociation between vision-for-perception and vision-for-action is not invalidated by D.F.'s case.

    Conclusions:

    • The perception-action model accurately accounts for patient D.F.'s grasping behavior.
    • Haptic feedback plays a role, but does not entirely explain D.F.'s grip scaling.
    • The study reinforces the distinction between visual perception and visually guided action pathways.