Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Cardiac Response to β-Adrenergic Stimulation Determined by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis
Published on: May 19, 2021
Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method
Matthieu Biais1, Vincent Cottenceau, Laurent Stecken
1Emergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, France. matthieu.biais@chu-bordeaux.fr
Stroke volume variations from the pressure recording analytic method do not reliably predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Pulse pressure variations are a better indicator of fluid responsiveness in these critically ill patients.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Mechanical Ventilation
Background:
- Fluid responsiveness assessment is crucial in mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure.
- Accurate prediction of fluid responsiveness guides fluid therapy and improves patient outcomes.
- Current methods for assessing fluid responsiveness have limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of stroke volume variations (SVV) derived from the pressure recording analytic method (PRAM) in predicting fluid responsiveness.
- To compare the predictive value of SVV with pulse pressure variations (PPV) and echocardiography-derived cardiac output.
- To determine if PRAM can accurately track changes in cardiac output after fluid administration.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study conducted in a surgical intensive care unit.
- Included 35 mechanically ventilated patients with circulatory failure undergoing fluid challenges.
- Measured SVV, PPV, and cardiac output (using PRAM and echocardiography) before and after a 500 mL saline fluid challenge.
Main Results:
- Nineteen patients (54%) were responders, defined by a ≥15% increase in echocardiography-derived stroke volume.
- Baseline SVV did not differ between responders and non-responders (10% vs. 14%).
- Pulse pressure variations were significantly higher in responders (17% vs. 7%; p < .0001) and demonstrated high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (88%) at a 10% threshold.
- PRAM-derived cardiac output changes did not correlate with echocardiography-derived changes (r = 0.14; p > .05).
Conclusions:
- Stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method are not reliable predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.
- Pulse pressure variations are a more effective predictor of fluid responsiveness in this population.
- The pressure recording analytic method is inadequate for tracking cardiac output changes induced by volume expansion.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Output II: Effect of Stroke Volume on Cardiac Output
Preload
Preload refers to the initial elongation of the cardiac myocytes before contraction and is related to the volume of blood filling the heart at the end of diastole, or end-diastolic volume. The...
Regulation of Stroke Volume
Preload refers to the degree of stretch on the heart before it contracts. It's analogous to the stretching of a rubber band; the more it's stretched, the more forcefully it snaps back. This concept is encapsulated in the Frank-Starling law of the...
Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume
In an average resting adult male, the typical cardiac output averages...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Measurement of Blood Pressure

