Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Online Gamers
Published on: November 9, 2019
Validity of the Problem Gambling Severity Index interpretive categories
Shawn R Currie1, David C Hodgins, David M Casey
1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. scurrie@ucalgary.ca
Abstract:
The Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) is a widely used nine item scale for measuring the severity of gambling problems in the general population. Of the four gambler types defined by the PGSI, non-problem, low-risk, moderate-risk and problem gamblers, only the latter category underwent any validity testing during the scale's development, despite the fact that over 95% of gamblers fall into one of the remaining three categories. Using Canadian population data on over 25,000 gamblers, we conducted a comprehensive validity and reliability analysis of the four PGSI gambler types. The temporal stability of PGSI subtype over a 14-month interval was modest but adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.63). There was strong evidence for the validity of the non-problem and problem gambler categories however the low-risk and moderate-risk categories showed poor discriminant validity using the existing scoring rules. The validity of these categories was improved with a simple modification to the scoring system.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains for...
Reliability and Validity
