Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward scalable species descriptions for dark taxa: the role of molecular data.

ZooKeys·2026
Same author

Embracing Bayesian Methods in Clinical Trials: FDA's Long-Awaited Draft Guidance.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Characterizing a species-rich and understudied tropical insect fauna using DNA barcoding.

GigaScience·2026
Same author

Labour requirements for healthy and sustainable diets at global, regional, and national levels: a modelling study.

The Lancet. Planetary health·2025
Same author

Fire Severity and Habitat Type Determine Vegetation Change and Regeneration Time Following Wildfires in Scottish Uplands.

Ecology and evolution·2025
Same author

Verifying authors' claims to have conducted a Systematic Review? A checklist for journal editors and peer reviewers.

Environmental evidence·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda.

William J Sutherland1, Laura Bellingan, Jim R Bellingham

  • 1Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. w.sutherland@zoo.cam.ac.uk

Plos One
|March 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Understanding the science-policy interface is crucial. This study identifies key research questions to improve the relationship between policymakers and scientists, fostering better evidence-based decision-making.

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Science and Policy Studies
  • Research Management
  • Knowledge Transfer

Background:

  • The science-policy relationship is vital but often challenging and dysfunctional.
  • Contentious issues and public controversy highlight the increasing visibility of this interface.
  • A clearer understanding of the science-policy dynamic is needed for effective governance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key unanswered questions regarding the science-policy relationship.
  • To catalyze and focus future research in this critical interdisciplinary field.
  • To improve mutual understanding and effectiveness at the science-policy interface.

Main Methods:

  • A collaborative procedure involving 52 participants with diverse science and policy experience.
  • Participants consulted colleagues, submitting 239 initial questions.
  • A workshop refined these questions, identifying 40 key areas through discussion and voting.

Main Results:

  • A list of 40 prioritized questions concerning the science-policy interface.
  • Questions cover decision-making structures, expertise legitimacy, transparency, evidence selection, uncertainty, and policy influence on evidence.
  • Identified questions address theoretical gaps and practical challenges.

Conclusions:

  • The identified questions will guide future research on the science-policy relationship.
  • This research aims to enhance the effectiveness of scientists and policymakers working together.
  • Improved understanding is expected to strengthen evidence-based policy and governance.