Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence: Overview01:16

Bioequivalence: Overview

Pharmaceutical equivalents, by definition, are drug products with the same active ingredient in the same quantities, encapsulated in identical dosage forms, and intended for the same administration routes. These pharmaceutical equivalents are deemed bioequivalent if the bioavailability of the active entity in the drug preparations is similar. Moreover, pharmaceutical equivalents demonstrating bioequivalence are also regarded as therapeutically equivalent. This means that when used as directed,...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications01:09

Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

The concept of therapeutic equivalence (TE) in drugs with multiple indications is complex. A generic drug may be therapeutically equivalent to a brand-name product for one specific indication, but this doesn't necessarily mean it's equivalent for all other indications. Evidence of TE in one patient group and bioequivalence shown in healthy volunteers can support—but not confirm—TE for other indications. However, definitive proof requires individual clinical studies for each indication due to...
Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence01:17

Equivalence: In Vitro and In Vivo Bioequivalence

Bioequivalence studies are crucial in evaluating whether new drugs can match an approved one regarding pharmacological effects and clinical performance. These studies test if drugs, despite different dosage forms, share identical plasma concentration-time profiles. Three types of equivalence are central to these studies: chemical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic. Chemical equivalence indicates that two or more drug products contain identical active ingredients in equal amounts. Pharmaceutical...
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods01:20

Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods

Pharmacodynamic methods provide insights into a drug's effects on physiological processes over time and play a crucial role in understanding bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy. These methods can be broadly classified into acute pharmacological and therapeutic response approaches, each with distinct mechanisms and applications.The acute pharmacological response method directly correlates a drug's physiological effects, such as ECG or pupil diameter changes, to its time course in the body.
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In vitro and in vivo studies of three radiolabelled somatostatin analogues: 123I-octreotide (OCT), 123I-Tyr-3-OCT and 111In-DTPA-D-Phe-1-OCT.

European journal of nuclear medicine·1996
Same author

The Ras GTPase-activating-protein-related human protein IQGAP2 harbors a potential actin binding domain and interacts with calmodulin and Rho family GTPases.

Molecular and cellular biology·1996
Same author

Comparison of iodine-123-vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor scintigraphy and indium-111-CYT-103 immunoscintigraphy.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·1996
Same author

Ras1 signaling and transcriptional competence in the R7 cell of Drosophila.

Genes & development·1996
Same author

Localization of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase mRNA expression in mouse brain following methylmercury treatment using reverse transcription in situ PCR amplification.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·1996
Same author

Hypersensitizing effect of pluronic L61 on cytotoxic activity, transport, and subcellular distribution of doxorubicin in multiple drug-resistant cells.

Cancer research·1996
Same journal

Impact of pharmacist-initiated educational interventions on improving medication reconciliation practice in geriatric inpatients during hospital admission in Vietnam.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Evaluation of off-label anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid implant medication uses in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion in Turkey.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

A descriptive analysis of pharmacological management of aggression and/or agitation in patients with traumatic brain injury in a Southwest Virginia inpatient population.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Effects of caregiver counselling on medication persistence and adherence in patients with dementia at a pharmacist-managed clinic: A pilot study.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

The 50% and 95% effective doses of remimazolam tosilate with adjuvant sufentanil for sedation in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing oesophagogastric varices screening endoscopy.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
Same journal

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor combined with intravenous immunoglobulin and heparin for treatment of recurrent spontaneous abortion: A two-centre, retrospective, cohort study.

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

Pharmacodynamic bioequivalence testing.

S Li

    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
    |March 21, 2012
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence testing offers an alternative to pharmacokinetic (PK) studies for locally acting drugs. Further research is needed to determine if adjusted acceptance criteria for PD bioequivalence are appropriate.

    More Related Videos

    A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
    07:02

    A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

    Published on: February 11, 2019

    Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs
    10:02

    Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs

    Published on: July 23, 2016

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 23, 2026

    In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
    07:25

    In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

    Published on: May 4, 2017

    A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
    07:02

    A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

    Published on: February 11, 2019

    Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs
    10:02

    Use of Rabbit Eyes in Pharmacokinetic Studies of Intraocular Drugs

    Published on: July 23, 2016

    Area of Science:

    • Pharmacology
    • Drug Development
    • Bioequivalence Studies

    Background:

    • Assessing bioequivalence for locally acting drugs with poor systemic absorption poses challenges.
    • Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies may not be suitable when plasma concentrations don't correlate with therapeutic effects or systemic absorption is undesirable.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To discuss the appropriateness of pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence testing as an alternative to PK studies.
    • To explore the potential adjustment of acceptance criteria for PD bioequivalence based on response variability.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and commentary on existing approaches to bioequivalence testing for locally acting drugs.
    • Discussion of the US FDA's recommendation for PD endpoints in specific cases (e.g., acarbose).
    • Exploration of concepts related to adjusting acceptance intervals for highly variable drugs.

    Main Results:

    • Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies are standard but may be inappropriate for certain drug classes.
    • Pharmacodynamic bioequivalence is being investigated as an alternative, with regulatory bodies considering it.
    • The applicability of adjusted acceptance intervals from PK studies to PD bioequivalence remains unclear.

    Conclusions:

    • No consensus exists on PD bioequivalence testing criteria, but various methods are under investigation.
    • Further studies are required to evaluate adjusted acceptance intervals for PD bioequivalence based on within-subject variability.
    • Adjusted criteria could potentially reduce unnecessary drug exposure in study participants.