Related Experiment Videos

In vitro comparative study of the microbial leakage of one-step, thermafil and lateral condensation techniques

Hengameh Bakhtiar1, Neda Heidari, Peiman Mehrvarzfar

  • 1Department of Endodontics, Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Insights

Lateral condensation showed less bacterial penetration than Thermafil and One-Step techniques, though differences weren't significant over 60 days. Thermafil and One-Step are effective endodontic obturation methods.

Area of Science:

  • Endodontics
  • Dental Materials Science
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Achieving a predictable apical seal is crucial for endodontic treatment success.
  • Various obturation techniques exist, each with potential advantages and disadvantages regarding sealing ability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the apical seal effectiveness of three endodontic obturation techniques: lateral condensation, Thermafil, and One-Step.
  • To evaluate microleakage using a bacterial microleakage model.

Main Methods:

  • A two-chamber bacterial microleakage model was employed.
  • Enterococcus faecalis served as the microbial marker.
  • Bacterial penetration was monitored over a 60-day period, with leakage indicated by turbidity in the lower chamber.

Main Results:

  • Lateral condensation exhibited 45% bacterial penetration, Thermafil 80%, and One-Step 75%.
  • No statistically significant difference in microleakage was observed between the groups after 60 days.
  • However, microleakage was detected later in the lateral condensation group compared to Thermafil and One-Step.

Conclusions:

  • Thermafil and One-Step obturation techniques demonstrate effectiveness for predictable success in endodontic therapy.
  • These obturators are suitable devices for achieving a reliable apical seal in root canal filling.