Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

10:13
Hemi-laryngeal Setup for Studying Vocal Fold Vibration in Three Dimensions
Published on: November 25, 2017
Electroglottographic contact quotient in different phonation types using different amplitude threshold levels
Elina Kankare1, Anne-Maria Laukkanen, Irma Ilomäki
1University of Tampere, Speech and Voice Research Laboratory, School of Education, Tampere, Finland. elina.kankare@uta.fi
Logopedics, Phoniatrics, Vocology
|March 22, 2012
Summary
Contact quotient (CQ) measured by electroglottogram (EGG) effectively quantifies vocal fold contact. This study found CQ(EGG) correlates with perceived phonation firmness, particularly at lower amplitude thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Speech science
- Bioacoustics
- Laryngology
Background:
- Contact quotient (CQ) quantifies vocal fold contact duration during phonation.
- Electroglottography (EGG) is a non-invasive method to measure vocal fold contact.
- Understanding phonation types is crucial for voice production analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between CQ(EGG) and perceptual evaluation of phonation firmness.
- To determine the optimal amplitude threshold for CQ(EGG) measurement.
- To assess the influence of fundamental frequency (F0) and sound pressure level (SPL) on CQ(EGG).
Main Methods:
- Sustained vowel phonation was recorded in three phonation types: breathy, normal, and pressed.
- CQ(EGG) was calculated at amplitude threshold levels of 25%, 35%, and 50%.
- CQ(EGG) values were compared with expert perceptual judgments of phonation firmness.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in CQ(EGG) were observed across phonation types at all threshold levels (P < 0.01).
- Perceptual evaluation showed the best correlation with CQ(EGG) at 25% and 35% thresholds.
- Linear regression indicated that at the 25% threshold, F0 and SPL did not significantly affect CQ(EGG).
Conclusions:
- CQ(EGG) is a reliable measure for assessing vocal fold contact and perceived phonation firmness.
- Amplitude thresholds of 25% and 35% are recommended for optimal CQ(EGG) analysis.
- The 25% threshold minimizes the confounding effects of F0 and SPL on CQ(EGG) measurements.

