Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Surveys

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Psychology as a Science

Psychology as a Science

Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

TOO LATE: the weight of two words a reflection on empathetic communication.

Journal of communication in healthcare·2026

Same author

Understanding medical students' transition to clinical training: a qualitative study of transformative learning and professional identity formation.

BMJ open·2025

Same author

Core procedural skills in the MD curriculum: what students need to learn.

Frontiers in medicine·2024

Same author

Accreditation of medical education in Vietnam: From local to global excellence.

Pakistan journal of medical sciences·2022

Same author

Twelve tips for introducing E-Portfolios in health professions education.

Medical teacher·2022

Same author

Tears in my eyes: From the diary of a stranded academic.

Medical teacher·2021

Same journal

Self-regulated learning and academic success in health professions students: A systematic review.

Medical teacher·2026

Same journal

A response to: 'the hallucination of learning with generative artificial intelligence'.

Medical teacher·2026

Same journal

Beyond "student-led": Toward an entrustment framework for faculty involvement in student-led OSCEs.

Medical teacher·2026

Same journal

When what we can count is all that counts.

Medical teacher·2026

Same journal

Reframing interprofessional competencies through Ubuntu: A decolonial proposal.

Medical teacher·2026

Same journal

Uncovering the economic costs of rotation in postgraduate clinical training: A UK case study using a novel methodology.

Medical teacher·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Twelve tips for supervising research students.

Zarrin Seema Siddiqui¹, Diana R D Jonas-Dwyer

¹Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Western Australia, Education Centre, Perth, Australia. zarrin.siddiqui@uwa.edu.au

Medical Teacher

|March 23, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study offers twelve practical tips for new faculty members to improve their research supervision skills. These recommendations aim to enhance the academic mentoring experience for both supervisors and students.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Academic Development

Background:

Research supervision is a critical yet often challenging aspect of academic careers.
Many faculty members start supervising with limited formal training, relying on experience to develop skills.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide practical guidance for novice research supervisors.
To enhance the effectiveness and quality of academic mentoring.

Main Methods:

Critical reflection on personal experiences in research supervision.
Incorporation of student feedback and existing literature on best practices.

Main Results:

A curated list of twelve actionable tips for effective research supervision.
Strategies to navigate the complexities of guiding student research.

Conclusions:

Effective research supervision is essential for medical academics.
Prospective supervisors benefit from understanding supervision dynamics and practicalities prior to starting.