Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Human challenge studies: a review of adequacy of reporting methods and results
Jennifer A Kalil1, Scott A Halperin, Joanne M Langley
1Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Sanofi Pasteur Vaccine Challenge Unit, Dalhousie University & IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract:
Since the 1940s, researchers have purposefully infected healthy adult humans with pathogenic organisms to study how these pathogens cause disease and can be treated and prevented. 'Challenge studies' can be safe, ethical, extremely informative and an efficient use of resources during the clinical development of vaccines, but knowledge of this form of clinical research trial is not widespread. A review of the human challenge literature was performed to determine whether common elements of challenge studies can be identified in the articles published to date. The review demonstrated incomplete reporting of study characteristics deemed necessary for the correct interpretation and application of human challenge study results and for the accurate replication of study methodology. An unofficial extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement is proposed.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
