Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Ferromagnetic Bare Metal Stent for Endothelial Cell Capture and Retention
Published on: September 18, 2015
Comparison of late (3-year) registry data outcomes using bare metal versus drug-eluting stents for treating
Abid Assali1, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Hanna Vaknin-Assa
1Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Centre, Petah-Tikva, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. aassali@netvision.net.il
Insights
Drug-eluting stents (DES) show improved revascularization rates and similar 3-year mortality compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, DES use was linked to a higher risk of late stent thrombosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Clinical trials support drug-eluting stents (DES) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs).
- Limited real-world data exists on the late safety profiles of DES in STEMI patients.
- Bare-metal stents (BMS) are a common alternative in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the late safety and efficacy of DES versus BMS in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
- To assess long-term outcomes including mortality, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis.
Main Methods:
- Prospective registry-based study of 1,569 consecutive STEMI patients.
- Comparison of 200 patients treated with DES versus 1,369 patients treated with BMS.
- Primary endpoints: all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization at 1, 2, and 3 years.
Main Results:
- All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DES group at 3 years (4.2% vs 13.5%, p=0.007).
- Target vessel revascularization was significantly lower in the DES group (10.5% vs 21%, p=0.001), with DES use being an independent predictor.
- Late definite stent thrombosis (after 1 year) occurred more frequently in the DES group (2.5% vs 0.7%, p=0.05), with DES use as an independent predictor.
Conclusions:
- DES use in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI demonstrated improved revascularization rates.
- No increased 3-year hazard of adverse clinical outcomes was observed with DES compared to BMS.
- DES use was associated with an increased risk of late stent thrombosis, necessitating careful consideration.
Abstract:
Clinical trial data have supported the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), but contemporary "real-world" registry data regarding the late safety profiles of DES are limited. This prospective registry-based study included 1,569 consecutive unselected patients with STEMIs who underwent emergency primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2001 to December 2009. Of the study cohort, 200 patients (12.7%) received DES, while 1,369 patients (87.3%) underwent bare-metal stent (BMS) placement. The primary end points of the study were all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization at 1, 2, and 3 years. Survival status was assessed by municipal civil registries. Repeat revascularization procedures were prospectively collected in the hospital database. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the DES group at 3 years (4.2% vs 13.5%, p = 0.007) compared to BMS-treated patients, but DES use was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 1.2, p = 0.10). Target vessel revascularization was significantly lower in the DES group compared to the BMS group at 3 years (10.5% vs 21%, p = 0.001). DES use was an independent predictor of reduced target vessel revascularization (adjusted odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.77, p = 0.004). Late definite stent thrombosis occurring after 1 year occurred in 4 (2.5%) patients in the DES group compared to 6 (0.7%) in the BMS group (p = 0.05). DES use was an independent predictor of late stent thrombosis (adjusted odds ratio 8.6, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 38, p = 0.004). In conclusion, this contemporary registry-based study of patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI demonstrated improved revascularization rates without increased 3-year hazard of adverse clinical outcomes in DES-treated patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management