Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

An In vitro System to Gauge the Thrombolytic Efficacy of Histotripsy and a Lytic Drug
Published on: June 4, 2021
Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis
Edward T Casey1, M Hassan Murad, Magaly Zumaeta-Garcia
1Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
Systemic anticoagulation, surgical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis were compared for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Both thrombectomy and thrombolysis reduced postthrombotic syndrome risk compared to anticoagulation, with low-quality evidence.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Radiology
- Cardiology
Background:
- Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) poses significant risks, including postthrombotic syndrome.
- Treatment options include systemic anticoagulation, surgical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of systemic anticoagulation, surgical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral DVT.
- To compare treatment outcomes including postthrombotic syndrome, venous reflux, and obstruction.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple electronic databases and expert references for eligible studies.
- Extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes (death, PE, complications, PTS, pain, QoL, venous function markers).
- Utilized random effects models for relative risks and Bayesian indirect comparisons.
Main Results:
- Low-quality evidence indicates surgical thrombectomy significantly reduced postthrombotic syndrome and venous reflux compared to anticoagulation.
- Catheter-directed thrombolysis significantly reduced postthrombotic syndrome and venous obstruction compared to anticoagulation.
- Insufficient data existed to directly compare thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Low-quality evidence suggests surgical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis are more effective than systemic anticoagulation for preventing long-term sequelae of acute iliofemoral DVT.
- Further high-quality research is needed to directly compare thrombectomy and thrombolysis.
Objective:
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of three available treatments for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT): systemic anticoagulation, surgical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis.
Methods:
We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus) and sought additional references from experts. Eligible studies enrolled participants with acute iliofemoral DVT and measured the outcomes of interest. Reviewers working independently in duplicate extracted study characteristics, quality, and outcome data (death, pulmonary embolism, local complications, hemorrhagic complications, postthrombotic syndrome, pain, quality of life, and surrogate markers of venous function such as valve competence and patency). We pooled relative risks (RRs) from each study using the random effects model and estimated the 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bayesian indirect comparison techniques were used to compare thrombectomy to catheter-directed thrombolysis.
Results:
We found 15 unique studies that fulfilled eligibility criteria. When compared to systemic anticoagulation, thrombectomy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of developing postthrombotic syndrome (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87), venous reflux (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99), and a trend for reduction in the risk of venous obstruction (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60-1.19). When compared to systemic anticoagulation, pharmacologic catheter-directed thrombolysis was associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of postthrombotic syndrome (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.48), venous obstruction (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.37), and a trend for reduction in the risk of venous reflux (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16-1.00). Overall, the quality of evidence was low; downgraded due to the observational nature of the majority of studies, lack of comparability of study cohorts at baseline, loss to follow-up, imprecision, and indirectness of outcomes (surrogacy). There were insufficient data to compare the outcomes of thrombectomy to catheter-directed thrombolysis.
Conclusions:
Low-quality evidence suggests that surgical thrombectomy decreases the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome and venous reflux. Catheter-directed pharmacologic thrombolysis decreases the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome and venous obstruction.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management
