Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Measuring Ascending Aortic Stiffness In Vivo in Mice Using Ultrasound
Published on: December 2, 2014
Magnitude and return time of the reflected wave: the effects of large artery stiffness and aortic geometry
Berend E Westerhof1, Nico Westerhof
1BMEYE, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.westerhof@vumc.nl
Insights
Arterial stiffness significantly impacts systolic pressure. Reflection parameters like augmentation index are most sensitive to stiffness, but cannot accurately quantify arterial stiffness.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Physiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Increased large artery stiffness is a key factor in systolic pressure and cardiovascular events.
- Wave reflection, including return time and magnitude, influences systolic pressure and is thought to indicate aortic stiffness.
- Existing assumptions suggest return time decreases inversely with pulse wave velocity (PWV) as aortic stiffness increases, but empirical data shows limited variation in inflection points.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of aortic stiffness on wave reflection using an anatomically accurate arterial model.
- To analyze the relationship between arterial stiffness and various wave reflection parameters.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an anatomically accurate arterial model to simulate blood flow and pressure dynamics.
- Calculated return time, inflection and shoulder points, augmentation index, and reflection magnitude (Pb/Pf) using standard methodologies.
Main Results:
- Augmentation index is the most sensitive reflection parameter to changes in aortic stiffness.
- Reflection magnitude depends on both aortic geometry and distal reflections, leading to complex, nonlinear relationships with stiffness.
- Return time and inflection points vary differently with stiffness and PWV, indicating they cannot be used to derive PWV.
- Pulse pressure is highly dependent on aortic stiffness, while aortic taper significantly alters return time but minimally affects other reflection parameters.
Conclusions:
- Quantitative assessment of arterial stiffness cannot be reliably obtained from reflection parameters alone.
- The augmentation index demonstrates the highest sensitivity to variations in arterial stiffness.
Background:
Increased large artery stiffness is a major determinant of systolic pressure and indicator of cardiovascular events. The reflected wave, its arrival time (return time) and magnitude, contributes to systolic pressure, and is a supposed indicator of aortic stiffness. With aortic stiffening, the return time is assumed to decrease inversely with PWV as 2L/PWV, where L is the aortic length. However, several studies reported that the inflection point of aortic pressure, a surrogate of return time, varies little with aortic stiffness.
Methods:
We studied the effects of aortic stiffness on wave reflection in an anatomically accurate arterial model. Return time is time difference of forward, Pf, and backward, Pb, pressure. Return time, inflection and shoulder points, augmentation index, and reflection magnitude (Pb/Pf) were calculated by standard rules.
Results:
Peripheral resistance does not affect reflection directly, but only through pressure (stiffness) changes. Magnitude of reflected waves depend about equally on aortic geometry (taper, branches) and distal aortic reflection. Therefore, relations of augmentation index and reflection magnitude with stiffness are nonlinear and complex; augmentation index is most sensitive to stiffness. Between PWV 6 and 12 m/s, representing ages of 20-80 years, return time and inflection and shoulder points change differently with stiffness and PWV cannot be derived from them. Pulse pressure is strongly dependent on aortic stiffness. Taper changes return time by a factor 2, but has little effect on reflection magnitude, augmentation index, and inflection point.
Conclusion:
Accurate quantitative information on arterial stiffness cannot be obtained from reflection parameters. The augmentation index is most sensitive to stiffness changes.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulse
The pulse serves as a clinical indicator...
