Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of patient outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals.

The Journal of nursing administration·2015
Same author

Exemplary professional practice: the core of a magnet® organization.

The Journal of nursing administration·2015
Same author

Transformational leadership and navigating change.

The Journal of nursing administration·2012
Same author

Trust: a core value of healthy organizations.

The Journal of nursing administration·2012
Same author

State of the science related to nurse work environments, safe practices, and organizational outcomes.

The Journal of nursing administration·2012
Same author

The evolution of a manual revision.

The Journal of nursing administration·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Empirical outcomes: proof of making a difference.

Craig Luzinski1

  • 1Magnet Recognition Program®, American Nurses Credentialing Center, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, USA. craig.luzinski@ana.org

The Journal of Nursing Administration
|March 24, 2012
PubMed
Summary

The Magnet Recognition Program® emphasizes Empirical Quality Outcomes. Utilizing existing data and establishing benchmarks demonstrates an organization's excellence and serves as its performance report card.

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Administration
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • The Magnet Recognition Program® is a hallmark of nursing excellence.
  • Empirical Quality Outcomes are a critical component of the Magnet® Model.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the significance of Empirical Quality Outcomes within the Magnet® Model.
  • To guide organizations on leveraging existing data for outcome measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the Magnet® Model component on Empirical Quality Outcomes.
  • Analysis of the utility of currently collected organizational data.

Main Results:

  • Existing data can be effectively utilized to measure quality outcomes.
  • Establishing quantitative benchmarks is crucial for demonstrating excellence.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical Quality Outcomes serve as a vital "report card" for Magnet®-recognized organizations.
  • Strategic use of outcomes data simplifies the demonstration of nursing excellence.