Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The SAGES masters program presents the 10 seminal articles for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Surgical endoscopyยท2024
Same author

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.

Obesity surgeryยท2024
Same author

Current recommendations for procedure selection in class I and II obesity developed by an expert modified Delphi consensus.

Scientific reportsยท2024
Same author

Surgeon experience with insurance barriers to offering gastric bypass as an evidence-based operation for pathologic GERD.

Surgical endoscopyยท2023
Same author

Intrathoracic Sleeve Migrations After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Compilation of Case Reports.

Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part Aยท2020
Same author

Medium-term outcomes of converting laparoscopic adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index <35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>: a uniquely Australian perspective.

Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgeryยท2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats
08:16

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats

Published on: November 10, 2018

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Melissa Beitner1, Marina S Kurian

  • 1Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, Suite 10S, New York, NY 10016, USA. Melissa.beitner@nyumc.org

Abdominal Imaging
|March 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding offers a low-risk bariatric surgery option for morbid obesity, achieving significant excess weight loss. Close aftercare and frequent follow-ups are crucial for successful long-term outcomes.

More Related Videos

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice
10:05

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice

Published on: March 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats
08:16

One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Rats

Published on: November 10, 2018

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice
10:05

Techniques of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Modified Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Mice

Published on: March 20, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Bariatric Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Obesity Treatment

Background:

  • Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a weight loss procedure for morbid obesity.
  • LAGB has a lower perioperative risk than other bariatric surgeries like gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy.
  • While effective for excess weight loss, long-term reoperation rates for LAGB have historically varied widely.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the efficacy and outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
  • To highlight the importance of post-operative care and follow-up in LAGB success.
  • To discuss factors influencing reoperation rates in gastric banding patients.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.
  • Analysis of perioperative risks, excess weight loss, and reoperation rates.
  • Examination of the impact of aftercare and patient monitoring on outcomes.

Main Results:

  • LAGB demonstrates approximately 50% excess weight loss at 5 years.
  • Reoperation rates have decreased with technique improvements, though historically varied (2%-80%).
  • Increased patient follow-up (6-7+ visits in the first year) correlates with better weight loss.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is a viable bariatric option with a favorable risk profile.
  • Optimized surgical techniques and comprehensive aftercare are essential for maximizing weight loss and minimizing complications.
  • Patient engagement through frequent post-operative monitoring is a key determinant of successful long-term outcomes.