Foxes as a potential wildlife reservoir for mecA-positive Staphylococci

Marianne Carson1, Anna L Meredith, Darren J Shaw

  • 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Insights

Foxes carry methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), a public health concern. This study found mecA-positive staphylococci in UK foxes, suggesting they are a potential wildlife reservoir for these resistant bacteria.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Microbiology
  • Antimicrobial Resistance
  • Wildlife Health

Background:

  • Methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), pose significant public and veterinary health risks.
  • Understanding MRS reservoirs beyond human hospitals is crucial for controlling their spread and persistence.
  • Foxes, due to increasing human proximity and known roles as zoonotic pathogen hosts, were investigated as potential MRS reservoirs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the carriage of staphylococci and their antimicrobial resistance patterns in foxes in the UK.
  • To determine if foxes serve as a reservoir for methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS).

Main Methods:

  • Staphylococci isolation from nasal, oral, axillary, and perineal swabs of 38 UK foxes.
  • Species identification using standard bacteriological tests and API ID32 STAPH.
  • Antimicrobial resistance profiling via disc diffusion tests and mecA gene detection.

Main Results:

  • Staphylococci were identified in 35 of 38 foxes, with coagulase-negative species predominating (S. sciuri group, S. equorum, S. capitis).
  • All isolates were phenotypically resistant to methicillin, and the mecA gene was detected in 89% of isolates.
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was not detected; only 27% showed broad beta-lactam resistance.

Conclusions:

  • Foxes are identified as a potential wildlife reservoir for mecA-positive staphylococci.
  • Environmental antimicrobial contamination may exert selection pressure on staphylococci in wildlife populations.
  • Further research into wildlife-borne antimicrobial resistance is warranted.