Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critical Care Scoring System--new concept based on hemodynamic data.

H C Yeung1, M W Lu, E G Martinez

  • 1Critical Care Center, Mount Carmel Mercy Hospital, Detroit, MI.

Critical Care Medicine
|December 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of Replacement Grafts and Punch Grafts in the Treatment of Vitiligo.

Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology·2017
Same author

Comparative assessment of platelet GpIIb/IIIa receptor occupancy ratio with Eptifibatide/Tirofiban in patients presenting with ACS and undergoing PCI.

Indian heart journal·2013
Same author

Genetic characterization and in vivo image analysis of novel zebrafish Danio rerio pigment mutants.

Journal of fish biology·2013
Same author

A comparison of critical structure dose and toxicity risks in patients with low grade gliomas treated with IMRT versus proton radiation therapy.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2012
Same author

Immunomagnetic reduction assay for nervous necrosis virus extracted from groupers.

Journal of virological methods·2012
Same author

Pattern-Based Interactive Diagnosis of Multiple Disorders: The MEDAS System.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Attracting Emergency Medicine Graduates to Surgical Critical Care Training Programs.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond a Snapshot: Tracking Family Prognostic Expectations in the ICU.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

The authors reply.

Critical care medicine·2026
Same journal

Plasma Levels of Soluble ST2 Reflect Extrapulmonary Organ Dysfunction and Predict Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Failure: Beware of Potential Confounders.

Critical care medicine·2026
See all related articles

A new Critical Care Scoring System (CCSS) shows improved mortality prediction in critically ill patients compared to APACHE II. Serial CCSS (CCSS-C) effectively tracks therapeutic intervention effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Critically ill patients often exhibit derangements in hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and perfusion.
  • Existing scoring systems may have limitations in accurately assessing mortality risk and treatment efficacy in specific patient subgroups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel Critical Care Scoring System (CCSS).
  • To compare the predictive performance of CCSS against the APACHE II score for mortality and complications.
  • To assess the utility of serial CCSS measurements (CCSS-C) in evaluating therapeutic interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 318 critically ill patients managed with pulmonary artery catheters.
  • Calculation of both CCSS and APACHE II scores for all patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of mortality prediction accuracy and complication reflection between the two scoring systems.
  • Evaluation of serial CCSS-C measurements for tracking patient improvement.
  • Main Results:

    • CCSS demonstrated statistically significant mortality prediction (p < .0001), outperforming APACHE II.
    • APACHE II showed deficiencies in predicting mortality for patients requiring invasive monitoring.
    • Both scores reflected life-threatening complications, but neither predicted ICU length of stay.
    • Serial CCSS-C provided statistically improved mortality prediction and documented patient improvement post-intervention.

    Conclusions:

    • The Critical Care Scoring System (CCSS) offers a potentially superior tool for mortality prediction in critically ill patients, especially those with circulatory or respiratory failure.
    • CCSS, particularly when used serially (CCSS-C), can effectively evaluate therapeutic interventions and patient response.
    • The findings suggest CCSS may be more suitable than APACHE II for patients requiring invasive monitoring.