Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
Published on: May 10, 2019
Greater benefits of multisensory integration during complex sensorimotor transformations
Verena N Buchholz1, Samanthi C Goonetilleke, W Pieter Medendorp
1Radboud Univ. Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. verena.buchholz@donders.ru.nl
Multisensory integration benefits gaze shifts, especially in crossed postures. This surprising finding suggests dynamic interactions between spatial principles and inverse effectiveness enhance sensorimotor transformations.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Human sensorimotor control
- Multisensory processing
Background:
- Multisensory integration is crucial for rapid and accurate behavior.
- Integrating sensory information across different reference frames and postural contexts is essential for spatial orientation and motor responses.
- Cross-hemispheric sensory convergence in certain postures may pose challenges for multisensory integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of hand posture (uncrossed vs. crossed) on multisensory integration during orienting gaze shifts.
- To determine if crossed postures, requiring cross-hemispheric integration, enhance or hinder multisensory benefits.
- To explore the underlying principles governing multisensory integration in complex sensorimotor transformations.
Main Methods:
- Human participants performed orienting gaze shifts to visual, tactile, or visuotactile stimuli.
- Stimuli were presented in either a default uncrossed hand posture or a crossed posture.
- Reaction times and error rates were measured to quantify the effects of multisensory integration and posture.
Main Results:
- The greatest benefits of multisensory integration, indicated by reaction time decreases, were observed in the crossed posture.
- These reaction time improvements in the crossed posture did not lead to an increase in errors.
- The findings suggest a dynamic interplay between the spatial principle and inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration.
Conclusions:
- Multisensory integration provides significant advantages for sensorimotor transformations, even in complex crossed postures.
- The principles of spatial representation and inverse effectiveness dynamically interact to facilitate rapid and accurate motor responses.
- Inverse effectiveness may extend beyond external stimulus properties to encompass internal spatial representations influenced by body posture.
Related Concept Videos
Somatosensory, Motor, and Association Cortex
Somatosensation
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the stimulus...
Parallel Processing
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
