Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spinal motion restriction in the emergency healthcare setting: A cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

International emergency nursing·2026
Same author

Knowledge and Willingness to Perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Bystanders in Jordan; A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

Archives of academic emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Internationally Informed Consensus on Research Priorities in Paramedicine and Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

Prehospital emergency care·2026
Same author

High-Frequency Simulation-Based Assessment to Improve Clinical Competence in Paramedicine Education.

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare·2026
Same author

Point-of-care ultrasound in prehospital emergency care: attitudes, facilitators and barriers.

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

Does transthoracic impedance influence termination and recurrence of ventricular fibrillation during impedance-compensated shocks for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A retrospective study.

Resuscitation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Construct validation of the readiness for interprofessional learning scale: a Rasch and factor analysis.

Brett Williams1, Ted Brown, Malcolm Boyle

  • 1Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Frankston, Australia. brett.williams@monash.edu

Journal of Interprofessional Care
|March 31, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study refined the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) for healthcare students. A validated 17-item, four-factor scale emerged, improving interprofessional education assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Health Professions Education
  • Psychometrics
  • Interprofessional Collaboration

Background:

  • Interprofessional education (IPE) is crucial for healthcare efficiency and collaboration.
  • Pre-existing attitudes can hinder IPE, necessitating reliable measurement tools.
  • The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) is commonly used to assess student perspectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine the original 19-item RIPLS using statistical analysis.
  • To validate a revised RIPLS for measuring healthcare students' readiness for interprofessional learning.
  • To identify and potentially remove items that do not fit the proposed structure.

Main Methods:

  • Principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation was performed on data from 418 Australian undergraduate healthcare students.
  • Rasch model analyses were subsequently applied to the RIPLS data.
  • Item fit and scale dimensionality were evaluated using both PCA and Rasch modeling.

Main Results:

  • Initial PCA yielded a four-factor solution, differing from the original three-factor structure.
  • Rasch analyses confirmed a four-factor structure but identified two misfitting items.
  • The revised 17-item, four-factor RIPLS demonstrated good fit to the Rasch model, reliability, and dimensionality.

Conclusions:

  • A refined 17-item, four-factor RIPLS is recommended for assessing healthcare students' readiness for interprofessional learning.
  • Two items from the original RIPLS were identified as not fitting the revised structure and should be considered for removal.
  • Further refinement of the RIPLS is suggested to enhance its psychometric properties and utility in IPE research.