Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using Rectus Femoris Tendon Autograft.

Arthroscopy techniques·2025

Same author

Ketoprofen Recognition and Sensing by Zn(II) Complexes with Fluorogenic Triamine Receptors.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Sevoflurane and Desflurane Spin-Decoherence Effect on Fe(III)acetylacetonate Redox Process.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Ten Pearls for Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Repair.

Arthroscopy techniques·2025

Same author

Surgical and conservative management of medial plica syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2025

Same author

Comparable clinical outcomes between octogenarians and young patients following robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics·2025

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

New biomaterials for bone regeneration.

Fabrizio Matassi¹, Lorenzo Nistri, Diana Chicon Paez

¹University of Florence, Italy.

Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism : the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases

|March 31, 2012

Summary

Synthetic bone graft substitutes offer an alternative to traditional bone grafts, addressing limitations in reconstructive surgery. These advanced materials mimic natural bone and can deliver therapeutic agents to enhance bone regeneration.

Keywords:

biomaterials regenerative medicine.scaffold tissue engineering

More Related Videos

Decellularized Apple-Derived Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering In Vitro and In Vivo

Decellularized Apple-Derived Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 23, 2024

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Decellularized Apple-Derived Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering In Vitro and In Vivo

Decellularized Apple-Derived Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering In Vitro and In Vivo

Published on: February 23, 2024

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

Area of Science:

Biomaterials Science
Regenerative Medicine
Orthopedic Surgery

Background:

Autografts and allografts are standard bone grafting methods but present challenges in reconstructive surgery.
Limitations of autografts and allografts include donor site morbidity, disease transmission, and limited availability.
Synthetic bone graft substitutes have been developed to overcome these drawbacks.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a comprehensive overview of biomaterials used in synthetic bone graft substitutes.
To highlight the role of these substitutes in mimicking native bone properties.
To discuss the potential of these materials in drug and growth factor delivery for enhanced bone regeneration.

Main Methods:

Review of current literature on synthetic bone graft materials.
Analysis of biomaterials employed in designing osteoconductive scaffolds.
Examination of materials including natural and synthetic polymers, ceramics, metals, and composites.

Main Results:

Synthetic bone graft substitutes aim to replicate the physical and mechanical characteristics of native bone.
These substitutes are designed to be osteoconductive, promoting new bone formation.
Advanced substitutes can facilitate controlled, localized release of drugs or growth factors.

Conclusions:

Synthetic bone graft substitutes represent a promising alternative to conventional grafting materials.
The selection of appropriate biomaterials is crucial for developing effective bone graft substitutes.
Further research into biomimetic scaffolds holds significant potential for advancing bone reconstruction techniques.