Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Assessment of the Mouth01:26

Assessment of the Mouth

A thorough mouth assessment, including inspection and palpation of the lips, gums, tongue, tonsils, uvula, and pharynx, is crucial in detecting potential health issues. Diseases ranging from oral cancer to systemic conditions like diabetes could be identified early through careful oral examination. This article provides a detailed guide on conducting a comprehensive mouth assessment.
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oral rehabilitation of tooth agenesis frequently starts in paediatric dentistry. A retrospective analysis of 625 patients.

European journal of paediatric dentistry·2022
Same author

Correction to: The impact of organisational characteristics of staff and facility on infectious disease outbreaks in care homes: a systematic review.

BMC health services research·2022
Same author

The impact of organisational characteristics of staff and facility on infectious disease outbreaks in care homes: a systematic review.

BMC health services research·2022
Same author

Reply to: letter to the editor about the article published in Clinical Oral Investigations tilted: impacted and transmigrated mandibular canines: an analysis of 3D radiographic imaging data (Bertl MH, Frey C, Bertl K, Giannis K, Gahleitner A, Strbac GD (2018) Clin Oral Investig, doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2342-0.

Clinical oral investigations·2018
Same author

A principal components analysis: how pneumatization and edentulism contribute to maxillary atrophy.

Oral diseases·2016
Same author

Anatomical preconditions for the palatal sinus floor augmentation—A three-dimensional feasibility study.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Three-dimensional Quantification of Intestinal Mucus Using Whole-mount Tissue Imaging
05:10

Three-dimensional Quantification of Intestinal Mucus Using Whole-mount Tissue Imaging

Published on: September 12, 2025

The "puffed cheek method" to evaluate mucosal thickness: case series.

G Dvorak1, C Arnhart, P Schön

  • 1Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb Dental School, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria. gabriella.dvorak@meduniwien.ac.at

Clinical Oral Implants Research
|April 3, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Computed tomography (CT) with distended cheeks offers a non-invasive method for assessing mucosal thickness during implant treatment planning. However, this technique provides less reliable results compared to traditional needle probing.

More Related Videos

Technique of Conjunctival Biopsy and Direct Immunofluorescence for Diagnosing Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
05:05

Technique of Conjunctival Biopsy and Direct Immunofluorescence for Diagnosing Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Published on: June 17, 2025

Measuring Diaphragm Thickness and Function Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound
05:51

Measuring Diaphragm Thickness and Function Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Published on: November 3, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Three-dimensional Quantification of Intestinal Mucus Using Whole-mount Tissue Imaging
05:10

Three-dimensional Quantification of Intestinal Mucus Using Whole-mount Tissue Imaging

Published on: September 12, 2025

Technique of Conjunctival Biopsy and Direct Immunofluorescence for Diagnosing Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
05:05

Technique of Conjunctival Biopsy and Direct Immunofluorescence for Diagnosing Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid

Published on: June 17, 2025

Measuring Diaphragm Thickness and Function Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound
05:51

Measuring Diaphragm Thickness and Function Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Published on: November 3, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Dental implantology
  • Oral and maxillofacial radiology

Background:

  • Accurate mucosal thickness measurement is crucial for dental implant treatment planning.
  • Current methods like needle probing are invasive and not routinely used.
  • Computed tomography (CT) is valuable for assessing bone availability, but lacks simultaneous soft tissue measurement capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of measuring buccal maxillary mucosal thickness using CT with distended cheeks.
  • To compare CT measurements with the established needle probing method.

Main Methods:

  • Buccal maxillary mucosal thickness was assessed at four sites in 11 patients using CT with distended cheeks and needle probing.
  • A thermoplastic splint and gutta-percha marker ensured precise measurement localization.
  • Bland-Altman analysis was employed to compare the two measurement techniques.

Main Results:

  • The mean mucosal thickness measured by CT (1.11 ± 0.31 mm) was comparable to needle probing (1.17 ± 0.31 mm).
  • The mean difference between methods was 0.07 mm, with a 95% confidence interval of -0.14 to 0.12 mm.
  • Bland-Altman analysis indicated a potential divergence of up to 0.9 mm between CT and needle probing measurements.

Conclusions:

  • CT with distended cheeks is not interchangeable with needle probing for mucosal thickness measurement.
  • While CT can provide supplementary pre-operative soft tissue information for implant planning, it is less valid and reliable than the gold standard.
  • Further research may refine CT-based soft tissue assessment in implant dentistry.