Different current intensities electrical stimulation of prelimbic cortex of mPFC produces different effects on

AliAkbar Kargari1, Effat Ramshini, HojjatAllah Alaei

  • 1Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Insights

Electrical stimulation of the prelimbic cortex (PL) impacts morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP). High PL stimulation (100 μA) suppressed CPP, impairing learning, while low stimulation (25 μA) enhanced it.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is integral to the brain's reward system, supporting learning and memory.
  • The mPFC, specifically the prelimbic cortex (PL), receives dopaminergic input from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and projects to the VTA and nucleus accumbens (NAc).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of varying electrical stimulation intensities on the prelimbic cortex (PL) on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP).
  • To determine how PL stimulation, with and without morphine, influences learning and memory during conditioning and post-conditioning.

Main Methods:

  • Morphine (0.5 and 5 mg/kg) or saline was administered subcutaneously.
  • Electrical stimulation of the PL was applied at intensities of 25, 50, 100, and 150 μA.
  • Conditioned place preference (CPP) was assessed during conditioning and post-conditioning phases.

Main Results:

  • Morphine (5 mg/kg) significantly induced CPP compared to saline.
  • PL electrical stimulation at 100 μA suppressed morphine-induced CPP, suggesting impaired learning and memory formation.
  • Low PL stimulation (25 μA) combined with a low morphine dose (0.5 mg/kg) increased CPP probability, indicating potentiation of the reward system.

Conclusions:

  • Electrical stimulation of the PL modulates morphine-induced CPP, affecting learning and memory processes.
  • High-intensity PL stimulation can disrupt reward-related learning, potentially by blocking hippocampal-prefrontal pathways.
  • Low-intensity PL stimulation may enhance reward system activity, increasing CPP likelihood.