Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Classical Conditioning

Classical Conditioning

Associative learning, a core principle in behavioral psychology, involves forming connections between events and facilitating learned responses. This concept is vividly illustrated by classical conditioning, a process extensively studied by the Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov. Pavlov's pioneering research on dogs' digestive systems led to the discovery that behaviors can be learned through association, laying the groundwork for classical conditioning.
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs salivated...

Principles of Classical Conditioning

Principles of Classical Conditioning

Classical conditioning, as described by Ivan Pavlov, is a foundational concept in associative learning, where a neutral stimulus becomes capable of eliciting a conditioned response through association with an unconditioned stimulus. The process of acquisition, where this learning occurs, and the subsequent phenomena of contiguity, contingency, generalization, discrimination, extinction, and spontaneous recovery are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of classical conditioning.
During the...

Conditioned Taste Aversion

Conditioned Taste Aversion

Conditioned taste aversion, also known as sauce béarnaise syndrome, is a phenomenon in which an individual develops an aversion to a certain food taste following a negative experience, typically illness. This form of aversion is a type of classical conditioning in which the taste of the food (conditioned stimulus, CS) is associated with the experience of illness (unconditioned stimulus, UCS).
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single exposure...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Alcohol Craving and Cue Exposure in Real Time: A Pilot Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA)-Based Personalized Feedback Intervention for Young Adults.

Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs·2025

Same author

Investigating cognitive and motivational proximal outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of writing about the future self to reduce drinking.

Alcohol, clinical & experimental research·2024

Same author

Writing about the future self to shift drinking identity: An experimental investigation.

Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)·2023

Same author

Why get high? Coping and enjoyment motives mediate elevated cannabis demand and cannabis-related outcomes.

Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors·2023

Same author

The association between cannabis use and risk of non-medical pain reliever misuse onset among young adults in a legal cannabis context.

Addictive behaviors·2023

Same author

Maturing Out: Between- and Within-Persons Changes in Social-Network Drinking, Drinking Identity, and Hazardous Drinking Following College Graduation.

Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

Pavlovian biconditional discrimination learning in the C57BL/6J mouse.

Jason J Ramirez¹, Ruth M Colwill

¹Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, United States. jason ramirez@brown.edu

Behavioural Processes

|April 3, 2012

Summary

Mice learned Pavlovian biconditional discriminations when outcomes differed, but not when identical. Differential outcomes are crucial for acquiring complex stimulus-outcome associations in animals.

More Related Videos

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Whisker-signaled Eyeblink Classical Conditioning in Head-fixed Mice

Published on: March 30, 2016

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

A Flexible Platform for Monitoring Cerebellum-Dependent Sensory Associative Learning

Published on: January 19, 2022

Area of Science:

Animal Behavior
Learning and Memory
Neuroscience

Background:

Pavlovian biconditional discrimination involves learning associations between stimulus compounds and outcomes.
Temporal arrangement of stimuli and differential outcomes are critical factors in associative learning.
Understanding these factors informs models of learning and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the acquisition of Pavlovian biconditional discriminations in mice.
To examine the role of temporal stimulus arrangement and differential outcomes in this learning process.
To evaluate the findings in the context of modulatory models of animal learning.

Main Methods:

Four experiments were conducted using mice to assess the acquisition of biconditional discriminations.
Stimulus compounds were presented, with some paired with food (reinforced) and others not (non-reinforced).
Temporal asynchrony was manipulated using contextual stimuli and discrete visual cues, with differential outcomes introduced in one experiment.

Main Results:

Successful acquisition of the discrimination was observed when differential outcomes were provided.
Acquisition failed when identical outcomes followed reinforced compounds, even with temporal disambiguation.
The effectiveness of discrete cue stimulus compounds was dependent on differential outcomes.

Conclusions:

Differential outcomes are essential for the acquisition of Pavlovian biconditional discriminations, particularly with discrete cue compounds.
The temporal arrangement of stimuli alone is insufficient for successful learning without outcome differentiation.
Findings challenge simple associative models and support the role of modulatory processes in complex learning.