Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

07:36
An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Does the truth come out in the writing? Scan as a lie detection tool
Galit Nahari1, Aldert Vrij, Ronald P Fisher
1Department of Criminology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel. naharig@mail.biu.ac.il
Law and Human Behavior
|April 5, 2012
Summary
Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) failed to detect lies, unlike Reality Monitoring (RM). This study questions SCAN
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Deception Detection
- Verbal Analysis
Background:
- Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) is a widely used verbal lie detection tool.
- Federal law enforcement and military agencies globally employ SCAN.
- The efficacy of SCAN in distinguishing truthful statements from deceptive ones requires empirical validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of the Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) tool.
- To compare the lie detection capabilities of SCAN against Reality Monitoring (RM).
- To determine the suitability of SCAN for law enforcement and military applications.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-one participants provided written statements about recent activities.
- Statements were categorized as truthful, outright lies, or concealment lies.
- Statements were analyzed using both SCAN and Reality Monitoring (RM) protocols.
Main Results:
- Reality Monitoring (RM) significantly differentiated between truth-tellers and outright liars.
- RM also effectively distinguished truth-tellers from concealment liars.
- SCAN did not achieve significant discrimination between truth-tellers and either type of liar.
Conclusions:
- The findings raise concerns about the reliability of SCAN as a lie detection instrument.
- RM demonstrated superior performance in discriminating deception compared to SCAN.
- Further research is needed to ascertain the practical utility of SCAN in forensic contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
False Memories
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Leaky Scanning
During most eukaryotic translation processes, the small 40S ribosome subunit scans an mRNA from its 5' end until it encounters the first start AUG codon. The large 60S ribosomal subunit then joins the smaller one to initiate protein synthesis. The location of the translation initiation is largely determined by the nucleotides near the start codon as there may be multiple translation initiation sites present on the mRNA. Marilyn Kozak discovered that the sequence RCCAUGG (where R stands for...
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
