Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Own clinical observations of treatment outcome in acute type B aortic dissection
Dariusz Janczak1, Jan Skóra, Jerzy Garcarek
1Department of Surgery, 4th Military Clinical Hospital, Wrocław.
Insights
This study compared treatments for acute type B aortic dissection. Endovascular and hybrid procedures showed better outcomes than conventional surgery, while conservative treatment is suitable for uncomplicated cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Vascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Acute type B aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt and effective treatment.
- Treatment strategies have evolved, including conventional surgery, endovascular repair, hybrid approaches, and conservative management.
- Optimal management depends on disease complexity and patient factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare the early results of different treatment modalities for acute type B aortic dissection.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hybrid, endovascular, conventional surgical, and conservative treatments.
- To identify the most suitable treatment approach based on dissection characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 59 patients treated between 1998 and 2011.
- Patients were divided into four groups: hybrid procedures (Group I, n=10), endovascular procedures (stent-grafting, Group II, n=13), conventional surgery (Group III, n=21), and conservative treatment (Group IV, n=15).
- Outcomes including mortality and complications were compared across groups.
Main Results:
- Hybrid procedures (Group I) achieved good outcomes in 60% of patients, with a 40% mortality rate.
- Endovascular procedures (Group II) had a mortality rate of approximately 7.7% (1 death during procedure, 1 endoleak requiring re-intervention).
- Conventional surgery (Group III) had a high mortality rate of 85%, with 72% mortality from the primary procedure and additional deaths from corrective cardiac surgery.
- Conservative treatment (Group IV) showed the lowest mortality rate at 13%.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular procedures demonstrate clear superiority over conventional surgery for acute type B aortic dissection.
- Hybrid procedures are effective in reducing mortality and morbidity for acute, complicated type B aortic dissections.
- Uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections are best managed conservatively in intensive care units.
Unlabelled:
The aim of the study was to analyse early results of treatment of acute type B aortic dissection.
Material And Methods:
59 patients, treated between 1998 and 2011, were divided into four groups. Group I comprised ten patients in whom hybrid procedures were performed: extra-anatomical by-pass graft from the brachio-cephalic trunk to the left carotid artery in six patients, transposition of the left carotid artery to the right one in two patients, and reversed Y prosthesis from the brachio-cephalic trunk to both carotids in the remaining 2 patients, to facilitate stent-grafting. Group II comprised 13 patients in whom endovascular procedures were performed (stent-grafting). Group III comprised 21 patients in whom conventional surgery was done. Group IV comprised 15 patients who were treated conservatively.
Results:
In group I, a very good clinical outcome, without complications, was achieved in six patients (60% of cases). The total mortality rate was 40%. One patient died on the operation table, following stent-grafting, due to the rupture of the aortic arch. Two patients died as a result of brain damage (cerebral aneurysm rupture in one, and ischemic stroke in the other). In one patient, an aorto-oesophageal fistula developed. In group II, one patient died during endovascular procedure. Another patient suffered from type 1 endoleak, requiring repeated endovascular surgery. In group III, 15 patients (72%) died. Moreover, four patients required acorrective cardiac surgery (Bentall procedure)which in three patients resulted in death. Thus, the total mortality rate in this group was as high as 85%. In group IV, the mortality rate was 13%.
Conclusions:
We noticed a clear superiority of endovascular procedures over conventional surgeries-for acute type B aortic dissection. Hybrid procedures for acute, complicated type B aortic dissection evidently reduce mortality and postoperative morbidity. Uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissections should be treated conservatively at intensivecare units.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management