Urodynamic features and artefacts
Stephen Hogan1, Andrew Gammie, Paul Abrams
1Faculty of Advanced Technology, University of Glamorgan, Treforest, Pontypridd, UK. sbhogan@glam.ac.uk
Aims:
The aims of this study are to compile a list of common features and artefacts found in urodynamics, to produce definitions of these features, and describe any necessary remedial action. An image and word description for each event has been included as well as statistics providing information on the prevalence and frequency of each event.
Methods:
In order to identify the most common features and artefacts 200 consecutive urodynamic traces were reviewed. A random 10% sample was cross-checked to ensure event classification accuracy. To extract significant pressure peaks from the data, an algorithm was written capable of detecting initial resting pressure and updating it as necessary. Significant pressure peaks were defined as those that differed from resting pressure values by 10 cmH(2) O or more. When describing the events, standard sources were consulted for published definitions. The images selected for each event are typical examples but do not represent the variation that can occur between examples. The patients whose files were used in this study suffered from a variety of lower urinary tract disorders so that it is likely that they cover all common or important urodynamic pressure events.
Results:
In total 10,355 pressure events were identified and classified into 19 different categories. For each category, a description, example image and remedial action are included. Where published definitions do not exist, new ones are proposed.
Conclusions:
All common or important urodynamic pressure events have been included in this study and descriptions of the events have been included in one article for the first time.
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding I: Inspection and Percussion
Inspection Findings
During an inspection, several findings may suggest the presence of respiratory distress or disease. Pursed-lip breathing, where exhalation is slowed by...
Respiratory System Abnormal Finding II: Palpation and Auscultation
Palpation Findings
During a respiratory assessment, palpation can reveal several vital abnormalities:
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract IV: Auscultation
Breath Sounds
Breath sounds are categorized into vesicular, bronchovesicular, and bronchial.
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.


