Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Language Development01:22

Language Development

Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
Language and Cognition01:27

Language and Cognition

Language serves as a bridge between ideas and communication, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world. Psychologists have long debated whether language shapes thought or vice versa. This discussion gained grip with Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf in the 1940s, who proposed that language determines thought, a concept known as linguistic determinism. They suggested that the vocabulary and structure of a language influence how its speakers think and perceive reality.
The Nativist Approach01:21

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Comparing Human Video Modeling to Animated Video Modeling for Learners with Autism.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025
Same journal

Using Concealed Public Accompaniments to Teach Individuals to Tact Intensity.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025
Same journal

Acquisition of Incidental Bidirectional Naming: Isolating the Effects of Probing and Mixed-Operant Instruction.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025
Same journal

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Stimulus-Stimulus Pairings to Increase Vocalizations in Children with Language Delays: 2015-2024.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025
Same journal

Context and Meaning in Acts of Translation and Interpretation.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025
Same journal

A Preliminary Investigation into Teaching Adolescents with Autism to Use Apps to Solve Problems.

The Analysis of verbal behavior·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Some issues in infant speech perception: do the means justify the ends.

Raymond S Weitzman1

  • 1California State University, Fresno.

The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
|April 6, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Infant speech discrimination research relies on the Head-Turn Preference Procedure. This study argues the procedure is flawed, questioning the validity of conclusions about infant speech processing.

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Infants demonstrate sensitivity to acoustic properties of speech.
  • Research on infant speech discrimination informs theories of internal speech processing.
  • The Head-Turn Preference Procedure is a common experimental method in this field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the Head-Turn Preference Procedure.
  • To assess the methodological soundness of the Head-Turn Preference Procedure.
  • To examine the validity of theoretical conclusions drawn from this procedure.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the Head-Turn Preference Procedure's methodology.
  • Review of experimental studies utilizing the Head-Turn Preference Procedure.

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

  • Examination of the link between empirical findings and theoretical interpretations.

    • Main Results:

    • The Head-Turn Preference Procedure is identified as methodologically flawed.
    • Theoretical conclusions derived from the procedure are not adequately supported.
    • Concerns are raised regarding the interpretation of infant speech discrimination data.

    Conclusions:

    • The methodological limitations of the Head-Turn Preference Procedure impact research validity.
    • Further scrutiny of experimental protocols is needed in infant language acquisition studies.
    • Re-evaluation of existing theories on infant speech processing may be necessary.