Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Behaviorism01:28

Behaviorism

The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Law of Effect01:06

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Behavior Therapy01:22

Behavior Therapy

Behavior therapy incorporates diverse techniques rooted in classical conditioning principles to address maladaptive behaviors and anxiety disorders. These methods aim to reduce avoidance behaviors, foster adaptive coping mechanisms, and alter associations between stimuli and responses, making them effective in a wide range of therapeutic contexts.
Exposure therapy is a cornerstone of behavioral treatment for anxiety disorders. It involves systematic exposure to feared stimuli, either in real...
Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction01:24

Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction

Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Exercise following breast cancer: exploratory survival analyses of two randomised, controlled trials.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
Same author

Exercise following breast cancer: exploratory survival analyses of two randomised, controlled trials.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2017
Same author

Synthesis of new photosensitive H<sub>2</sub>BBQ<sup>2+</sup>[ZnCl<sub>4</sub>]<sup>2-</sup>/[(ZnCl)<sub>2</sub>(μ-BBH)] complexes, through selective oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>O to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2017
Same author

DOES TREATMENT ALLEVIATE LYMPHEDEMA SYMPTOMS? A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY EVALUATING PATIENT PERSPECTIVES.

Lymphology·2016
Same author

EFFECTS OF COMPRESSION ON LYMPHEDEMA DURING RESISTANCE EXERCISE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER-RELATED LYMPHEDEMA: A RANDOMIZED, CROSS-OVER TRIAL.

Lymphology·2015
Same author

Psychological flexibility and the gains of acceptance-based treatment for post-bariatric surgery: six-month follow-up and a test of the underlying model.

Clinical obesity·2015
Same journal

An Internal and Critical Review of the PEAK Relational Training System for Children with Autism and Related Intellectual Disabilities: 2014-2017.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Self-Control Based on Soft Commitment.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Behavioral Pragmatism: Making A Place for Reality and Truth.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

The Challenges of Integrating Behavioral and Neural Data: Bridging and Breaking Boundaries Across Levels of Analysis.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires.

The Behavior analyst·2020
Same journal

The Future of Behavior Analysis: Foxes and Hedgehogs Revisited.

The Behavior analyst·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
05:41

A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

Published on: February 6, 2020

Theory and technology in behavior analysis.

S C Hayes

    The Behavior Analyst
    |April 6, 2012
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Behaviorism distinctions are often confusing. This study proposes two dimensions—paradigm type and analysis level—to meaningfully categorize behaviorists and clarify internal behavior analysis debates.

    More Related Videos

    Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
    06:57

    Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

    Published on: May 14, 2019

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 23, 2026

    A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis
    05:41

    A Step-by-Step Implementation of DeepBehavior, Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Behavior Analysis

    Published on: February 6, 2020

    Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
    06:57

    Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

    Published on: May 14, 2019

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Behavioral Science

    Background:

    • Behaviorism and behavior analysis have numerous described distinctions.
    • Common distinctions like 'basic vs. applied' or 'clinical vs. non-clinical' lack clarity.
    • Existing categorizations often obscure rather than illuminate core differences.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a more meaningful framework for understanding differences within behaviorism.
    • To differentiate between behavior analysis and methodological behaviorism.
    • To clarify internal debates within behavior analysis.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of existing distinctions within behaviorism.
    • Introduction of two primary dimensions for classification: paradigm type and level of analysis.
    • Recasting of field issues based on these dimensions.

    Main Results:

    • Identified two key dimensions: paradigm type (behavior analysis vs. methodological behaviorism) and level of analysis (technical, methodological, conceptual, philosophical).
    • These dimensions offer a clearer way to categorize behaviorists.
    • Internal differences within behavior analysis are reframed as questions about theory and technology.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed two-dimensional framework provides a more precise way to understand diversity within behaviorism.
    • This approach clarifies complex issues, particularly the relationship between theory and technology in behavior analysis.
    • Meaningful units within behaviorism can be identified through paradigm and analysis level.