Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
Published on: August 4, 2023
Comments on cognitive science in the experimental analysis of behavior
E K Morris1, S T Higgins, W K Bickel
1Department of Human Development, Haworth Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
This study critically analyzes arguments for integrating cognitive science into the experimental analysis of behavior (TEAB). It examines cognitive concepts, objective inference, and historical causation within behavior analysis metatheory.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Science
- Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- Growing calls to incorporate cognitive science into the experimental analysis of behavior (TEAB).
- Previous integration attempts often relied on cognitive intervening variables and faced challenges in objective inference.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the arguments for including cognitive science in TEAB.
- To analyze the logical underpinnings of objective inference and the use of cognitive intervening variables.
- To discuss the role of immediate controlling stimuli in behavior analysis.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of existing arguments and metatheory in behavior analysis.
- Examination of concepts related to cognitive processes, such as the absence of immediate controlling stimuli.
- Review of alternative perspectives, including molar-molecular levels of analysis and historical causation.
Main Results:
- The study presents counter-arguments to the integration of cognitive science, rooted in behavior analysis principles.
- It highlights potential issues with objective inference and the reintroduction of cognitive intervening variables.
- Alternative theoretical frameworks within behavior analysis are emphasized.
Conclusions:
- The integration of cognitive science into TEAB requires careful consideration of behavior analysis metatheory and experimental practices.
- Counter-arguments emphasize the importance of objective inference and established behavioral principles.
- Further dialogue is needed on the conceptualization and analysis of behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Cognition and Behavior
Cognitive Learning
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

