Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Belief, its inconsistency, and the implications for the teaching faculty
The Behavior Analyst
|April 6, 2012
Summary
This study contrasts traditional beliefs with behavior analytic concepts, explaining belief inconsistencies like compartmentalization. It also explores social impacts and effective teaching strategies for shaping beliefs.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Behavior Analysis
Background:
- Traditional concepts of belief lack behavioral specificity.
- Understanding belief inconsistencies is crucial for psychological analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and compare traditional and behavior analytic concepts of belief.
- To examine inconsistencies in beliefs, including compartmentalization and repression.
- To explore social implications and educational strategies related to belief formation.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis comparing traditional and behavior analytic frameworks.
- Examination of psychological phenomena such as compartmentalization and repression.
- Review of social implications and pedagogical approaches.
Main Results:
- Beliefs and belief statements are distinct phenomena.
- Inconsistencies in beliefs can be explained through psychological mechanisms.
- Social dynamics involve punishment for inconsistency and counter-controls.
Conclusions:
- A behavior analytic approach offers a more precise understanding of beliefs.
- Educational strategies should consider the behavioral underpinnings of belief formation and inconsistency.
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
