Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Disorders01:29

Bone Disorders

Aging and its effect on bone remodeling is the most common cause of bone disorders. In young and healthy people, bone deposition and resorption happen at an equal rate to maintain optimal bone health.
Bone deposition is also affected by the levels of sex hormones like estrogen and testosterone that promote osteoblast activity and bone matrix synthesis. When the level of these hormones decreases due to aging, it causes a reduction in bone deposition. As a result, bone resorption by osteoclasts...
Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during bone...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole-neuron morphology and genetic identity define cell types and reveal principles of brain-wide connectivity.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Sitosterolemia due to compound heterozygous mutations in ABCG5: a case report.

Journal of medical case reports·2026
Same author

Activation of TRPM8 promotes K<sup>+</sup> secretion in rat epididymal epithelium.

Cell calcium·2026
Same author

Molecular Mechanisms of Felodipine Suppressing Atherosclerosis in High-Cholesterol-Diet Apolipoprotein E-Knockout Mice: Erratum.

Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology·2026
Same author

Electrostatic spray drying enhances transferrin hydrophilicity for improved rosmarinic acid binding: Insights into biological activity and molecular mechanism.

Food chemistry·2025
Same author

Integrated Classification of Cortical Cells and Quantitative Projectomic Mapping Unveil Organizational Principles of Brain-Wide Connectomes at Single Cell Level.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Implant-induced microdamage in osteoporotic bone.

Zhi-Feng Yu1, Ting-Ting Tang, Shi-Jing Qiu

  • 1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics Implant, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 20001, China.

Chinese Journal of Traumatology = Zhonghua Chuang Shang Za Zhi
|April 7, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Osteoporotic bone microdamage from implants impacts biomechanics. Bone remodeling and mineralization are key to repairing this damage, influencing implant stability.

More Related Videos

Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Evaluation in an Osteoporosis Mouse Model
06:59

Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Evaluation in an Osteoporosis Mouse Model

Published on: September 8, 2023

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models
06:16

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Published on: April 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Evaluation in an Osteoporosis Mouse Model
06:59

Trabecular Bone Microarchitecture Evaluation in an Osteoporosis Mouse Model

Published on: September 8, 2023

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models
06:16

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

Published on: April 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Gerontology

Background:

  • Increasing elderly population necessitates more bone implant surgeries.
  • Osteoporotic bone is susceptible to microdamage during implant procedures.
  • Microdamage, including cracks and diffuse damage, affects bone biomechanics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize research on peri-implant microdamage in osteoporotic bone.
  • To highlight the impact of microdamage on bone quality and implant stability.
  • To review repair mechanisms and influencing factors.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of peri-implant bone microdamage.
  • Analysis of factors affecting microdamage accumulation and repair.
  • Discussion of bisphosphonate effects on bone remodeling and microdamage.

Main Results:

  • Microcrack length and location significantly influence bone biomechanical performance.
  • Bisphosphonates can exacerbate microdamage accumulation, reducing bone strength.
  • Bone remodeling and mineralization are crucial for microdamage repair.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding microdamage is vital for long-term implant success in osteoporotic patients.
  • Bone quality and implant stability are directly linked to microdamage management.
  • Further research is needed on repair mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.