Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...

Statistical Significance

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The effects of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast on cognitive performance after a cerebrovascular accident: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial with an open label extension (ROSTMEMA).

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Chronic stress-induced depression-like behaviors through Th1-lymphocytes and microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in the mouse.

European journal of pharmacology·2026

Same author

Bolus MPTP Injection in Aged Mice to Mimic Parkinson Disease: Effects of Low-Dose Antioxidant Treatment with Fullerene (C<sub>60</sub>) and Fullerenol (C<sub>60</sub>(OH)<sub>24</sub>).

Biomedicines·2025

Same author

DNA Methylation: A Potential Mediator of the Memory Regulatory Effects of taVNS.

Cells·2025

Same author

Methylphenidate (Ritalin) does not improve exam performance in an experimental setting.

Psychopharmacology·2025

Same author

Perinatal Exposure to the Neonicotinoid Thiacloprid Impacts Transcription of Neuroplasticity and Neuroendocrine Markers in Mice but Not in the Zebrafish Model.

Journal of applied toxicology : JAT·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Object recognition testing: statistical considerations.

Sven Akkerman¹, Jos Prickaerts, Harry W M Steinbusch

¹Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience-MHeNS, European Graduate School of Neuroscience-EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Brain Research

|April 7, 2012

Summary

This study clarifies object recognition task data analysis in rodents. Different measures impact results, and researchers should verify individual group discrimination for accurate memory function assessment.

More Related Videos

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis

Published on: August 9, 2024

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Generating Strictly Controlled Stimuli for Figure Recognition Experiments

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Behavioral Science
Animal Cognition

Background:

The object recognition task is a standard method for evaluating rodent memory.
Analysis of object recognition data requires careful consideration of statistical measures.

Purpose of the Study:

To discuss various aspects of analyzing object recognition task data.
To compare different discrimination measures and statistical approaches.
To provide recommendations for robust data interpretation in rodent memory studies.

Main Methods:

Analysis of experimental and fictive data sets from object recognition tasks.
Comparison of absolute discrimination measure (d1) with ratio measures (d2, d3).
Evaluation of 48 object recognition task studies to assess discrimination performance.

Main Results:

The absolute discrimination measure (d1) differs from ratio measures (d2, d3).
Individual group discrimination should be assessed, potentially using a fictive no-discrimination group.
Discrimination performance in object recognition tasks does not significantly fall below zero, allowing one-sided testing if biases are excluded.

Conclusions:

Statistical analysis of object recognition data requires careful selection of measures and consideration of individual group performance.
Exploration levels can influence statistical outcomes, necessitating appropriate analytical adjustments.
Recommendations are provided for improved statistical evaluation of rodent memory using the object recognition task.