Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Is there a digital generation gap for e-learning in plastic surgery?
Roger J G Stevens1, Neil M Hamilton
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. r.stevens02@aberdeen.ac.uk
Background:
Some authors have claimed that those plastic surgeons born between 1965 and 1979 (generation X, or Gen-X) are more technologically able than those born between 1946 and 1964 (Baby Boomers, or BB). Those born after 1980, which comprise generation Y (Gen-Y), might be the most technologically able and most demanding for electronic learning (e-learning) to support their education and training in plastic surgery. These differences might represent a "digital generation gap" and would have practical and financial implications for the development of e-learning.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to survey plastic surgeons on their experience and preferences in e-learning in plastic surgery and to establish whether there was a difference between different generations.
Design:
Online survey (e-survey) of plastic surgeons within the UK and Ireland was used for this study.
Methods:
In all, 624 plastic surgeons were invited by e-mail to complete an e-survey anonymously for their experience of e-learning in plastic surgery, whether they would like access to e-learning and, if so, whether this should this be provided nationally, locally, or not at all. By stratifying plastic surgeons into three generations (BB, Gen-X, and Gen-Y), the responses between generations were compared using the χ(2)-test for linear trend. A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results:
Of the 624 plastic surgeons contacted, 237 plastic surgeons completed the survey (response rate, 38%), but data from 2 surgeons were excluded. For the remaining 235 plastic surgeons, no evidence was found of statistically significant linear trends between by generation and either experience, access, or provision of e-learning.
Conclusions:
These findings refute the claim that there are differences in the experience of e-learning of plastic surgeons by generation. Furthermore, there is no evidence that there are differences in whether there should be access to e-learning and how e-learning should be provided for different generations of plastic surgeons.
