Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

A Minimally Invasive Model of Aortic Stenosis in Swine
Published on: October 20, 2023
Progression of aortic stenosis in elderly patients over long-term follow up
L G Kearney1, M Ord, B F Buxton
1Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, VIC, Australia. leighton.kearney@austin.org.au
Insights
Elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS) show significant hemodynamic progression, influenced by AS severity, renal function, and valve calcification. These factors predict rapid progression, guiding surveillance strategies for older adults with AS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Geriatrics
- Valvular Heart Disease
Background:
- The natural history and progression of aortic stenosis (AS) in elderly populations are not well-defined.
- Understanding long-term outcomes is crucial for managing this common condition in older adults.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the rates and predictors of hemodynamic progression of AS in elderly patients.
- To evaluate the composite endpoint of aortic valve replacement (AVR) or death over long-term follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of 239 elderly patients (>60 years) with AS from 1988-1994, with follow-up until 2008.
- Progression analysis included 147 patients with at least two echocardiograms >6 months apart.
- Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded; follow-up was censored at AVR or death.
Main Results:
- Annualized mean aortic valve gradient progression rates increased with AS severity (mild: 4±4, moderate: 6±5, severe: 10±8 mmHg/year; p<0.001).
- Five-year event-free survival was significantly lower in moderate (23±7%) and severe (20±10%) AS compared to mild AS (66±5%).
- Independent predictors of rapid progression included baseline AS severity, aortic valve calcification, severe renal impairment, and anemia.
Conclusions:
- Hemodynamic progression of AS in the elderly is significantly influenced by baseline AS severity, renal function, aortic valve calcification, and a history of anemia.
- These identified predictors can help stratify risk for rapid progression.
- Frequent clinical and echocardiographic surveillance is recommended for elderly patients at high risk of AS progression.
Background:
The natural history of aortic stenosis (AS) in elderly patients remains poorly defined. In an elderly cohort over long-term follow-up, we assessed: 1) rates and predictors of hemodynamic progression and 2) composite aortic valve replacement (AVR) or death endpoint.
Methods:
Consecutive Department of Veterans' Affairs patients with AS (>60 years) were prospectively enrolled between 1988 and 1994 (n=239) and followed until 2008. Patients with ≥ 2 trans-thoracic echocardiograms >6 months apart were included in the progression analysis (n=147). Baseline demographics, comorbidities and echocardiography parameters were recorded. Follow-up was censored at AVR/death.
Results:
The age of patients was 73 ± 6 years; 82% were male. Baseline AS severity was mild (67%), moderate (23%) and severe (10%). Follow-up was 6.5 ± 4 years (range: 1-17 years). Annualized mean aortic valve gradient progression rates were: mild AS 4 ± 4 mmHg/year; moderate AS 6 ± 5 mmHg/year and severe AS 10 ± 8 mmHg/year (p<0.001). Five-year event-free survival was 66 ± 5%, 23 ± 7% and 20 ± 10% for mild, moderate and severe AS respectively. Progression to severe AS occurred in 35% and 74% of patients with mild and moderate AS respectively. Independent predictors of rapid progression were: baseline AS severity (per grade) (OR 2.6, p=0.001), aortic valve calcification (per grade) (OR 2.1, p=0.01), severe renal impairment (OR 4.0, p=0.04) and anemia (OR 2.3, p=0.05).
Conclusions:
In elderly patients, hemodynamic progression of AS is predicted by AS severity, renal function, aortic valve calcification and history of anemia. These factors identify patients at high risk of rapid hemodynamic progression, for whom more frequent clinical and echocardiographic surveillance is advisable.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
