Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[State of the art and innovations in breast cancer prevention and screening strategies].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same author

Breast cryoablation for small, low-risk breast cancers: Current evidence, practical integration, and future directions.

Diagnostic and interventional imaging·2026
Same author

Precision imaging and evolving therapies in paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas: from molecular diagnostics to imaging-guided management.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same author

[French recommendations for clinical practice, Nice/Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2024-2025: Management of localized cervical cancer].

Bulletin du cancer·2026
Same author

Targeted axillary dissection in breast cancer: current evidence and ongoing trials.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2026
Same author

Diagnostic discrepancies and clinical value of second medical opinions (SMO) for endometriosis: a nationwide study analysis.

BMC women's health·2025
Same journal

Co-clinical CT radiomics pipeline to establish candidate imaging biomarkers for colorectal cancer.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

T2-MAP outperforms native T1-MAP for staging liver fibrosis independent of steatosis and iron overload: A dual-cohort causal validation study.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

The added value of 3.0 T quantitative multivoxel proton <sup>1</sup>H-MR spectroscopy in the diagnostic work-up of breast lesions.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

A novel MRI-based formal head bone quality score for predicting the prognosis of the normal hip in patients with unilateral nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Prediction of efficacy and prognosis of PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor combination chemotherapy for gastric cancer using an AI model based on dual‑energy CT: A multicenter study.

European journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Superb microvascular imaging for evaluating the efficacy of microwave ablation in primary Hyperparathyroidism: A prospective study.

European journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Variability and errors when applying the BIRADS mammography classification.

Bruno Boyer1, Sandra Canale, Julia Arfi-Rouche

  • 1Cabinet d'imagerie médicale Italie, 6, place d'italie 75013 Paris, France. bboyer6120@gmail.com

European Journal of Radiology
|April 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) aims to standardize mammography reporting. This review examines why BIRADS terminology varies in practice, leading to errors, especially with BIRADS category 3.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) lexicon was developed by the American College of Radiology to standardize mammographic reporting.
  • Variability in the application of BIRADS terminology is a recognized issue in clinical practice.
  • These inconsistencies can lead to diagnostic errors in mammography.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the reasons behind the observed variations in BIRADS mammography reporting.
  • To describe common classification errors made by radiologists, with illustrative examples.
  • To provide a detailed examination of BIRADS category 3, identified as the most challenging to apply.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on studies analyzing BIRADS terminology and its application.
  • Analysis of reported classification errors in mammography.
  • In-depth review of BIRADS category 3 guidelines and clinical interpretations.

Main Results:

  • Identified key factors contributing to the variability in BIRADS terminology use.
  • Illustrated common reader errors in mammographic classification with examples.
  • Highlighted the specific challenges and ambiguities associated with BIRADS category 3.

Conclusions:

  • Variability in BIRADS application undermines standardization efforts and impacts diagnostic accuracy.
  • Understanding reader errors and the complexities of BIRADS category 3 is crucial for improving mammography reporting.
  • Further refinement or clearer guidelines for BIRADS category 3 may be necessary to enhance consistency.