Evaluation of an Emerging Research Center: Lessons Learned

Area of Science:

• Health Services Research
• Community Health
• Chronic Disease Management

Background:

• Federally funded exploratory research centers require rigorous evaluation.
• Interdisciplinary teams in centers like the Center for Ohana Self-Management of Chronic Illness (COSMCI) present unique evaluation challenges.
• Effective evaluation ensures research meets its purpose and achieves stated goals.

Purpose of the Study:

• To outline the development of an evaluation strategy for a community-based chronic illness self-management research center.
• To report lessons learned during the initial development phase of the COSMCI.
• To highlight the importance of evaluation in the success of exploratory research centers.

Main Methods:

• Utilized a systematic approach with formative and summative evaluation strategies.
• Addressed key concerns including research structure, pilot project processes, faculty scholarly activity, dissemination, and sustainability.
• Conducted interviews at year one and mid-point to assess process and effectiveness.

Main Results:

• Evaluation themes included inclusion, timelines, realistic expectations, ongoing assessment, and team adaptability.
• Timely identification of successes and challenges facilitated rapid interventions.
• The evaluation process supported the early development stage of the research center.

Conclusions:

• A robust evaluation process is essential for the effective development of research centers.
• Ongoing evaluation enables the celebration of achievements and early problem detection.
• Continuous evaluation supports adaptability and rapid response in exploratory research settings.