Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

Incomplete Dominance

Incomplete Dominance

Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.

Trihybrid Crosses

Trihybrid Crosses

Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal chance to...

Epistasis Analysis

Epistasis Analysis

Although Mendel chose seven unrelated traits in peas to study gene segregation, most traits involve multiple gene interactions that create a spectrum of phenotypes. When the interaction of various genes or alleles at different locations influences a phenotype, this is called epistasis. Epistasis often involves one gene masking or interfering with the expression of another (antagonistic epistasis). Epistasis often occurs when different genes are part of the same biochemical pathway. The...

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rethinking twin chimerism.

Transfusion·2025

Same author

A molecular classification of moles and its use in filiation tests.

Journal of forensic sciences·2021

Same author

Parentage of Hydatidiform Moles.

Journal of forensic sciences·2020

Same author

A review of the biology and classification of human chimeras.

Transfusion·2018

Same author

Paternity probabilities when an alleged father is a congenital chimera.

Transfusion·2018

Same author

Paternity probabilities when a child is a congenital chimera.

Transfusion·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

Empowering sibship analyses with reference pedigrees.

Robert E Wenk¹, Alison Shao

¹BRT Laboratories, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA. rwenk@brtlabs.com

|April 11, 2012

Summary

Using reference pedigrees with multiple relatives significantly improves the accuracy of sibling analysis. This method resolves inconclusive short tandem repeat (STR) testing results, enhancing familial relationship determination.

Area of Science:

Forensic genetics
Human genetics

Background:

Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis is crucial for sibship testing.
Inconclusive results can arise from single reference sibling comparisons.
Increasing STR loci offers limited improvement in problematic cases.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of using multiple reference siblings in sibship analysis.
To demonstrate the diagnostic improvement offered by two-person reference pedigrees.

Main Methods:

Analysis of full sibship in paternity cases using pairs of alleged father's children.
Reanalysis of test siblings with low sibship likelihood against two combined reference siblings.
Case studies showcasing the benefits of two-person reference pedigrees.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group

Published on: August 16, 2017

Main Results:

Two-person pedigrees exponentially increased sibship probabilities for true siblings.
Reference pedigrees statistically verified ambiguous sibships.
Exclusion of alleged sibships and identification of alternative relationships were possible.

Conclusions:

Reference pedigrees effectively resolve ambiguous sibship questions.
Incorporating additional verified relatives is more powerful than increasing test loci.
Verified blood relatives in reference pedigrees are recommended for unclear cases.