Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation

Planning for learning involves the development of a teaching plan. Teaching plans are similar to nursing care plans—both follow the steps of the nursing process. Planning in the teaching process involves setting goals and outcomes. Here, goals identify what a patient needs to achieve to understand a healthcare topic better, whereas the outcomes are the action to be performed by the patient to achieve the goal within a timeframe. For example, if the goal is to educate the patient about insulin...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Caregiver and Care Recipient Perspectives on Paediatric ED Mental Health Presentations: A Qualitative Study.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2026
Same author

Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same author

Co-producing process maps to understand and support improvements in the hospital-to-school transition following moderate-to-severe acquired brain injury in primary school-aged children.

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for altered consciousness and agitation following paediatric acquired brain injury: a scoping literature review.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

'In This Together': Co-designing a novel knowledge translation intervention to support understanding and management of agitation and altered consciousness following paediatric acquired brain injury.

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

The importance of non-clinical information in updating living recommendations: a case study of the Australian living COVID-19 clinical guidelines.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

How to define 'best practice' for use in Knowledge Translation research: a practical, stepped and interactive

Marije Bosch1, Emma Tavender, Peter Bragge

  • 1Research Fellow Senior Research Fellow Professor of Surgery & Public Health, Director, National Trauma Research Institute/Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Professorial fellow, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|April 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Developing actionable best practice recommendations is vital for Knowledge Translation (KT) research. This study presents an efficient, stepped process to create locally relevant recommendations from existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Keywords:
KT researchbest practicemethodology

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Knowledge Translation
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Defining 'best practice' is a critical first step in Knowledge Translation (KT) research.
  • Accurate definitions are necessary for measuring care gaps, setting implementation goals, and monitoring performance.
  • Existing high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) represent a significant investment in evidence synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a practical, stepped, and interactive process for developing actionable best practice recommendations.
  • To ensure recommendations are locally applicable and aligned with the best available research evidence.
  • To adapt these recommendations into process measures (quality indicators) for KT research.

Main Methods:

  • Identify and extract recommendations from high-quality CPGs.
  • Select strong recommendations in key clinical areas and update evidence.
  • Develop 'evidence statements' through stakeholder discussions and create locally applicable best practice recommendations.

Main Results:

  • A systematic, six-step process was developed for creating best practice recommendations.
  • The process facilitates the efficient use of existing CPGs and research evidence.
  • The output provides actionable recommendations suitable for developing quality indicators.

Conclusions:

  • Actionable definitions of local best practice are essential prerequisites for conducting KT research.
  • This process efficiently leverages existing resources from CPG development.
  • The developed methodology enables the creation of locally relevant, evidence-based best practice recommendations for KT research.