Comparison of the clinical outcome and systemic inflammatory marker levels between retroperitoneal and...

Whether the retroperitoneal approach (RA) or the transperitoneal approach (TA) for performing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in kidney transplant donors is less invasive is unclear. In this study, we compared the clinical outcome and systemic inflammatory marker levels between RA and TA to assess surgical invasiveness.

We enrolled 105 donors (RA: 41, TA: 64) who underwent LDN in our hospital. Evaluation of both approaches included comparison of conventional clinical parameters and preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 1-day postoperative levels of the following circulating inflammatory cytokines: Tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12p70.

The frequency of right nephrectomy being performed was significantly lower in the TA than in the RA group (3/64 vs 12/41, P<0.001). Other clinical parameters in the TA group, including the frequency of surgical complications and incidence of delayed graft function, were comparable to those in the RA group. Immediate and 1-day postoperative mean serum IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the RA than in the TA group (P=0.023 and 0.044, respectively). The 1-day postoperative mean serum IL-10 level was also significantly higher in the RA than in the TA group (P=0.041). Meanwhile, the mean serum IL-6 and IL-10 levels were not associated with surgical duration or estimated intraoperative blood loss.

Conventional clinical parameters related to surgical invasiveness were comparable in both approaches, thus indicating that both LDN approaches were similar and equally effective as minimally invasive procedures. The clinical significance of the higher postoperative mean serum IL-6 and IL-10 levels in the RA group remains to be clarified in a future study.