Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Energetically optimal running requires torques about the centre of mass
James R Usherwood1, Tatjana Y Hubel
1Structure and Motion Laboratory, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, North Mymms, Hatfield, Herts AL9 7TA, UK. jusherwood@rvc.ac.uk
Ground reaction forces (GRFs) passing through the center of mass (CoM) require more muscle work than optimal. Shifting GRFs slightly vertically is energetically favorable for bipedal locomotion, especially at high speeds.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Locomotion Dynamics
- Human and Animal Physiology
Background:
- Bipedal locomotion involves ground reaction forces (GRFs) interacting with the center of mass (CoM).
- These forces cause fluctuations in kinetic energy, necessitating muscular work for deceleration and re-acceleration during stance.
- Previous models often assumed GRF alignment through the CoM, potentially overlooking energetic costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analytically and numerically investigate the energetic cost of GRF-CoM alignment during bipedal locomotion.
- To determine if deviations from GRF alignment through the CoM are energetically favorable under realistic conditions.
- To explore the implications of these findings for human and animal locomotion, particularly concerning body inertia and speed.
Main Methods:
- Analytical modeling to assess mechanical work requirements for GRF-CoM alignment versus vertical forces.
- Numerical simulations to evaluate energetically favorable GRF pathways under realistic biomechanical conditions.
- Comparison of simulated CoM-torque profiles with empirical data from human running.
Main Results:
- Extreme cases with high body pitch moment of inertia show that GRF alignment through CoM demands greater mechanical work than a maintained vertical force.
- Numerical results indicate that GRFs passing between the CoM and vertical are energetically favorable in realistic running scenarios.
- Human running CoM-torque profiles are broadly consistent with mechanical work minimization, especially with appropriate pitch moment of inertia.
Conclusions:
- Shifting GRFs vertically, rather than aligning them through the CoM, offers energetic advantages in bipedal locomotion.
- These energetic savings, though small in typical human running, become significant at higher speeds and with greater body pitch moment of inertia.
- The findings suggest a potential biomechanical advantage for animals like kangaroos with high pitch moment of inertia due to their unique body structure.
Related Concept Videos
Torque
Torque can be considered as the rotational counterpart to force. Since forces change the translational...
Net Torque Calculations
Torque Free Motion
Work and Energy for Variable Forces
Equation of Motion: Rotation About a Fixed Axis
The tangential component is dependent on the direction of the angular acceleration of the flywheel. The tangential component of the acceleration propels the flywheel along its path. On the other hand,...
Equation of Motion: Center of Mass
Internal forces between any pair of particles manifest as collinear pairs of equal magnitude but opposite directions,...
