Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

The Portable Chemical Sterilizer (PCS), D-FENS, and D-FEND ALL: Novel Chlorine Dioxide Decontamination Technologies for the Military
Published on: June 29, 2014
Low-temperature decontamination with hydrogen peroxide or chlorine dioxide for space applications
1Biosafety Unit, Health Protection Agency, Microbiological Services Division, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom. thomas.pottage@hpa.org.uk
Vapor hydrogen peroxide and chlorine dioxide offer faster microbial reduction for spacecraft than dry heat. However, Bacillus thuringiensis showed resistance, suggesting a need to refine sterilization challenge organisms.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Space Science
- Sterilization Technology
Background:
- Current spacecraft microbial decontamination relies on high-temperature dry heat, which is time-consuming, costly, and limits material choices.
- Space agencies require alternative decontamination methods to prevent biological contamination of extraterrestrial destinations.
- Gaseous decontamination technologies are being investigated as potential replacements for dry-heat microbial reduction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the biological efficacy of vapor hydrogen peroxide (VHP) and chlorine dioxide (CD) gas for spacecraft microbial decontamination.
- To compare the effectiveness and required exposure times of VHP and CD against common spore-forming bacteria.
- To identify potential challenges and areas for improvement in current spacecraft sterilization protocols.
Main Methods:
- Five spore-forming Bacillus species were inoculated onto stainless steel coupons.
- Coupons were exposed to VHP and CD gas within a 20-m³ exposure chamber.
- Microbial reduction was quantified by log reductions in culturable bacteria after specific exposure times.
Main Results:
- VHP achieved 6-log reduction of Bacillus atrophaeus in 20 minutes; CD required 60 minutes for a 5-log reduction.
- Geobacillus stearothermophilus showed similar reduction patterns, with VHP being more rapid.
- Bacillus thuringiensis exhibited higher resistance to both VHP and CD, indicating it as a potential challenge organism.
Conclusions:
- Both VHP and CD demonstrate effectiveness in reducing microbial loads on spacecraft components at lower temperatures.
- Bacillus thuringiensis presents a significant challenge, suggesting current indicator organisms may not fully represent real-world sterilization efficacy.
- Re-evaluating indicator organisms and loading is crucial for developing more realistic and effective spacecraft sterilization procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
