Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Developing the 2011 Integrated Pediatric Guidelines for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction
Samuel S Gidding1, Stephen R Daniels, Rae Ellen W Kavey
1Nemours Cardiac Center, A. I. DuPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware 19803, USA. sgidding@nemours.org
Insights
Developing credible cardiovascular health guidelines for children requires both formal evidence review and expert human judgment. Continuous self-critique is essential as new evidence and contexts evolve.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric cardiovascular health
- Evidence-based guideline development
- Clinical decision-making
Background:
- The
- Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents
- provide a framework for pediatric care.
- Guideline development involves complex considerations beyond formal evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the development process of the new pediatric cardiovascular guidelines.
- To examine the interplay of evidence, human judgment, and ethical considerations.
- To offer recommendations for future guideline creation.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the guideline development context.
- Review of the formal evidence assessment process.
- Examination of quality grading and social/ethical issues.
- Critique of the final guidelines.
Main Results:
- A formal evidence review process is crucial for guideline credibility.
- Human judgment is indispensable for creating meaningful clinical recommendations.
- Guideline development is an ongoing, self-critical process.
Conclusions:
- Effective guideline development balances rigorous evidence with expert judgment.
- Future guidelines should incorporate lessons learned regarding process and context.
- Continuous adaptation to new evidence and evolving contexts is vital.
Abstract:
This article reviews aspects of development of the recently released "Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents" for pediatric care providers that remain in the area of human judgment. Discussed will be the context in which the guidelines were developed, the formal evidence review process, a consideration of how quality grades were established, key social/ethical issues that the panel confronted, and a critique of the final work with recommendations for future guideline development. Lessons learned are that both a formal evidence review process is essential to developing a credible document, and human judgment is critical to producing a meaningful result. Guideline development is a dynamic process that must be continuously self-critical as new evidence is acquired and sociopolitical and environmental contexts evolve.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care