Development and psychometric evaluation of the knowledge scale for adults with congenitally malformed hearts

Helén Rönning1, Kristofer Arestedt, Niels Erik Nielsen

  • 1Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science, Linköping University. helen.ronning@hhj.hj.se

Insights

A new scale, KnoCoMH, effectively assesses knowledge in adults with congenital heart disease. This tool helps evaluate understanding of medical treatments and daily life impacts for better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Education
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) often have knowledge gaps about their condition.
  • Current follow-up routines do not routinely assess CHD knowledge levels.
  • Lack of validated, user-friendly tools hinders knowledge assessment, potentially impacting patient engagement in care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and psychometrically evaluate a user-friendly knowledge scale for adults with CHD.
  • To create a tool that assesses understanding of CHD and its effects on daily life.
  • To facilitate routine knowledge assessment in clinical practice for improved patient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • The Knowledge Scale for Adults With Congenitally Malformed Hearts (KnoCoMH) was developed in two phases.
  • Phase 1 involved expert and patient assessment for face and content validity.
  • Phase 2 focused on psychometric evaluation, including item difficulty, internal consistency (KR-20), and test-retest reliability.

Main Results:

  • The KnoCoMH comprises 46 items across four domains: General Knowledge, Medical Treatment, Endocarditis Prophylaxis, and Contraceptives and Pregnancy.
  • Internal consistency (KR-20) ranged from 0.65 to 0.90 across domains, indicating acceptable reliability.
  • Test-retest correlations were significant (0.50–0.67, P < .01), and item difficulty varied, with a mean of 0.56.

Conclusions:

  • The KnoCoMH demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties for assessing knowledge in adults with CHD.
  • The scale is suitable for evaluating knowledge and its association with other outcomes in this population.
  • Further research is recommended to establish construct validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness.
Abstract