When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist.

Area of Science:

• Evaluation Theory
• Program Logic Modeling
• Participatory Evaluation

Background:

• The paper reflects on the application of program logic modeling to visualize evaluation theory.
• It specifically examines the work of Hansen, Alkin, and associates in this context.
• The author's understanding of practical participatory evaluation (PPE) is used as a lens.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the alignment of program logic modeling with practical participatory evaluation (PPE).
• To identify areas where the program logic modeling approach, as applied by Hansen et al., could be enhanced.
• To explore the distinction between a theoretical framework and evaluation theory.

Main Methods:

• Reflective analysis of program logic modeling in the context of evaluation theory.
• Comparison of the program logic modeling approach with the author's experience in practical participatory evaluation (PPE).
• Conceptual discussion on the evolution of theoretical frameworks and their potential to become theories.

Main Results:

• The program logic modeling approach is largely resonant with practical participatory evaluation (PPE).
• Key aspects underemphasized include the partnership element, stakeholders' role in credibility, and conceptual use.
• A distinction is made between a theoretical framework (bounding inquiry) and evaluation theory.

Conclusions:

• Program logic modeling is a useful tool for visualizing evaluation theory, but requires nuanced application in PPE.
• Further emphasis on partnership and stakeholder roles is needed for a more robust PPE.
• The paper raises critical questions about the transition of theoretical frameworks into established evaluation theories.