Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026
07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Artificial distinction and real discrimination
Elena Inarra1, Annick Laruelle
1BRiDGE, Foundations of Economic Analysis I, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), E-48015 Bilbao, Spain. elena.inarra@ehu.es
Journal of Theoretical Biology
|April 14, 2012
Summary
This study examines the hawk-dove game in finite populations where individuals don't know their own type. It reveals two evolutionarily stable strategies, with one type experiencing greater aggression in each.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Game Theory
- Behavioral Ecology
- Population Dynamics
Background:
- The hawk-dove game models strategic interactions in contests.
- Understanding evolutionary stable strategies (ESS) is crucial for predicting population behavior.
- Previous models often assume perfect self-knowledge, which is unrealistic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the hawk-dove game with imperfect self-knowledge in finite populations.
- To identify evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) under these conditions.
- To investigate the impact of population type on aggression and stability.
Main Methods:
- Modeling the hawk-dove game with two types of individuals lacking self-recognition.
- Analyzing the conditions for evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) in a finite population.
- Extending the analysis to a continuum of individuals to compare stability concepts.
Main Results:
- Two distinct evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) were identified in finite populations.
- In each ESS, one type of individual experiences significantly more aggression.
- No evolutionarily stable strategies (ESS) exist when considering a continuum of individuals; only neutrally stable strategies emerge.
Conclusions:
- Imperfect self-knowledge in finite populations leads to asymmetric aggression within stable strategies.
- The transition from finite populations to a continuum fundamentally alters the nature of strategic stability.
- Findings highlight the importance of considering population structure and information limitations in evolutionary game theory.
Related Concept Videos
02:55Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
01:24Natural and Artificial Concepts
In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint Vincent in...
02:16Stereotype Content Model
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
02:09Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
01:31Confirmation Biases
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
01:24Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...