Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Search for Physics beyond the Standard Model in Events with Overlapping Photons and Jets.

Physical review letters·2020

Same author

Measurements of triple-differential cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon+jet events in <math></math> collisions at <math> </math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2019

Same author

Measurement of the average very forward energy as a function of the track multiplicity at central pseudorapidities in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2019

Same author

Search for Low-Mass Quark-Antiquark Resonances Produced in Association with a Photon at sqrt[s]=13 TeV.

Physical review letters·2019

Same author

Search for new physics in top quark production in dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2019

Same author

Enhancing bowel screening: Preventing colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy in New Zealand.

Public health·2019

Same journal

Parallelized contactless microfluidic dispenser with superhydrophobic nozzles for scalable combinatorial screening.

Biomicrofluidics·2026

Same journal

Time resolved luminescence of millisecond lifetime dyes in droplet microfluidic systems.

Biomicrofluidics·2026

Same journal

Emerging trends in functional molecularly imprinted polymers for electrochemical detection of biomarkers.

Biomicrofluidics·2025

Same journal

Deep learning assisted mechanotyping of individual cells through repeated deformations and relaxations in undulating channels.

Biomicrofluidics·2025

Same journal

<i>Giardia</i> purification from fecal samples using rigid spiral inertial microfluidics.

Biomicrofluidics·2025

Same journal

Point of care sepsis diagnosis: Exploring microfluidic techniques for sample preparation, biomarker isolation, and detection.

Biomicrofluidics·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

Microfluidic sorting of microtissues.

D G Buschke, P Resto, N Schumacher

Biomicrofluidics

|April 17, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a novel microfluidic device for sorting large particles, such as embryoid bodies (EBs), enabling high-throughput analysis of 3D cell cultures. This technology efficiently purifies microtissues while maintaining cell viability and function.

More Related Videos

Microfluidics-based High-throughput Circulating Tumor Cell Sorting and Single-cell Sequencing Technology

Microfluidics-based High-throughput Circulating Tumor Cell Sorting and Single-cell Sequencing Technology

Published on: November 14, 2025

Microfluidic Device for the Separation of Non-Metastatic (MCF-7) and Non-Tumor (MCF-10A) Breast Cancer Cells Using AC Dielectrophoresis

Microfluidic Device for the Separation of Non-Metastatic (MCF-7) and Non-Tumor (MCF-10A) Breast Cancer Cells Using AC Dielectrophoresis

Published on: August 11, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

Microfluidics-based High-throughput Circulating Tumor Cell Sorting and Single-cell Sequencing Technology

Microfluidics-based High-throughput Circulating Tumor Cell Sorting and Single-cell Sequencing Technology

Published on: November 14, 2025

Microfluidic Device for the Separation of Non-Metastatic (MCF-7) and Non-Tumor (MCF-10A) Breast Cancer Cells Using AC Dielectrophoresis

Microfluidic Device for the Separation of Non-Metastatic (MCF-7) and Non-Tumor (MCF-10A) Breast Cancer Cells Using AC Dielectrophoresis

Published on: August 11, 2022

Area of Science:

Biotechnology
Microfluidics
Cell Biology

Background:

Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures and microtissues are increasingly used to mimic in vitro tissue microenvironments.
Flow cytometry advances enable high-throughput analysis of microtissues, but a method for sorting these large particles is lacking.
Current limitations hinder the purification of specific cell populations within complex 3D cultures.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and characterize an accessible microfluidic platform for sorting large particles.
To enable high-throughput purification of microtissues based on flow cytometry analysis parameters.
To address the need for effective sorting methods in 3D cell culture research.

Main Methods:

A microfluidic-based, electromechanical approach utilizing sheath-less asymmetric curving channels was designed.
The device was characterized by analyzing wall shear stress, channel tortuosity, and fluid vorticity.
Sorting efficiency and enrichment ratio were evaluated using fluorescently labeled embryoid bodies (EBs).

Main Results:

The microfluidic device achieved a sorting efficiency of 87.3% ± 13.5% for fluorescently labeled EBs.
An enrichment ratio of 12.2 ± 8.4 was obtained, demonstrating effective purification.
Cell viability, differentiation potential, and long-term function of sorted EBs were preserved.

Conclusions:

The developed microfluidic device offers an effective solution for sorting large particles like microtissues.
This technology supports non-invasive, high-throughput analysis and purification of 3D cell cultures.
The platform has significant implications for advancing research in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.